Skip to main content

KNOUSE FOODS SUED BY EEOC FOR SEXUAL AND NATIONAL ORIGIN HARASSMENT AND RETALIATION

HARRISBURG, Pa. – A major farm growers’ cooperative with processing plants in three states violated federal law by subjecting a class of female employees to pervasive harassment based on sex and national origin and firing one employee in retaliation for complaining about it, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit it announced today.

The EEOC charges in its suit against Knouse Foods Cooperative, Inc. that a class of female farmworkers was subjected to a sexually hostile work environment by male coworkers at its processing plant in Gardners, Pa. The perpetrators allegedly engaged in unrelenting sexual harassment, including: making sexual advances to female employees; asking them to expose their breasts; asking them on dates; and making vulgar sexual comments. The male coworkers also engaged in threatening behavior, such as using the forklift to chase women or blocking them with their bodies or a broom while they walked down the hall.

The EEOC also charges that the women were subjected to unlawful harassment because of their Mexican national origin. Employees yelled and cursed at the class members, threw things at them and pushed them, and called them derogatory terms such as “dumb Mexican” or “stupid Mexican.”

The EEOC said that the class members repeatedly complained about the sexual and national origin harassment to supervisors and managers, but Knouse Foods failed to take prompt and effective action to stop the harassment. Instead, the agency said, the harassment intensified or continued.

Further, the EEOC says that Knouse Foods retaliated against employees who opposed the harassment, including disciplining three of them for conduct that other employees routinely engaged in and were not disciplined for, and terminating one Mexican female employee as retaliation.

“This is another tragic example of an employer failing to stop cruel, humiliating, and illegal victimization of vulnerable employees,” said EEOC Acting Chairman Stuart J. Ishimaru. “Worse yet, here the employer even punished the victims for speaking out against their mistreatment. The EEOC is focused on protecting the rights of farmworkers and migrant workers to be free from employment discrimination and retaliation. That is why we’re filing this lawsuit.”

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it unlawful to harass employees based on sex, national origin or any other protected basis. Title VII also prohibits an employer from retaliating against someone who complains about employment discrimination. The EEOC filed suit (Civil Action No. 09-cv-1811) in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania after first attempting to reach a voluntary settlement. The EEOC seeks injunctive relief to end the discriminatory practices, plus back pay and compensatory and punitive damages to compensate the victims for their monetary losses and emotional pain and suffering.

“Unfortunately, farmworker women are often especially vulnerable to unlawful sexual harassment,” said District Director Marie M. Tomasso of the EEOC’s Philadelphia District Office, which oversees Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia, Maryland, and parts of New Jersey and Ohio. “The EEOC is committed to addressing the pervasive problem of sexual harassment of farmworker women and other low-income workers.”

Debra Lawrence, acting regional attorney for the EEOC’s Philadelphia District Office, added, “It is shocking that Knouse Foods tolerated such offensive and threatening behavior at its work site. The EEOC will continue its comprehensive efforts to enforce its mission of eradicating sexual and national origin harassment in the workplace – whether the workplace is a farm or an office and whether the victim is an hourly worker or an executive.”

According to its web site, http://www.knousefoodservice.com, Knouse Foods operates seven processing plants in three states, covering nearly 2.4 million square feet on close to 300,000 acres. Knouse Foods packs apple juice and applesauce in a variety of sizes and employs 150 individuals at its Gardners site.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...