Skip to main content

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF LEHR CONSTRUCTION AND KEY EXECUTIVES IN MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR FRAUD


SEE UPDATE TO THIS STORY
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictment of LEHR CONSTRUCTION CORP. (LEHR), a Manhattan-based construction company, and four of its executives for a scheme that defrauded their construction management clients of at least $30 million over the past decade. The company and its executives - Executive Vice-President and Director JEFFREY LAZAR, Executive Vice-President in charge of Operations TODD PHILLIPS, Finance Director STEVEN HALPER, and Chief of Estimating Department and Cost Control STEVEN WASSERMAN - are charged with Enterprise Corruption, Scheme to Defraud, and Grand Larceny.  In addition, LEHR and HALPER are charged with Money Laundering.[1]

LEHR is a Manhattan-based construction company paid by its clients to oversee interior renovation construction projects, acting in the capacity of either a general contractor (“GC”) - in which case it was paid a flat “lump sum” fee - or as a construction manager (“CM”), where it was paid a percentage of construction costs.

"This construction company was corrupt at all levels,” said District Attorney Vance. “Its executives developed - and successfully executed - a scheme to steal millions of dollars from their clients. Simply put, they used an over-invoicing scheme to steal from their construction management clients, and then used general contractor jobs to recover the stolen funds. Sadly, greed and corruption impose a hidden, billion-dollar-a-year tax on New York City’s construction industry. This Office and its Rackets Bureau will continue to pursue aggressive investigations to make sure that honest businesses can compete in this vital industry.” 

According to documents filed in court, between 1998 and 2010, LEHR systematically stole money from its CM clients throughout Manhattan. These thefts were recently made possible through a business model created by LEHR executives that shifted costs from LEHR’s GC projects to its CM projects.  In essence, LEHR had its subcontractors overcharge the CM clients on jobs where it was paid a percentage and, in return, agree to perform work for less money on the GC “lump sum” projects. This cost shifting maximized LEHR’s profits on the GC work because subcontractors performed the work for less than its true worth, without affecting LEHR’s profit on CM projects because the client, not LEHR, ultimately paid the inflated costs of the subcontractors.  

As detailed in court documents, LEHR executives created a document known as the “Bid Package,” which required that every subcontractor who submitted a bid to LEHR on a CM project inflate its bid by including a series of suspect labor “contingencies.” These “contingencies” added anywhere from 10 to 13 percent to the true bid submitted by the subcontractor. After a subcontractor was chosen by the client in consultation with LEHR, that subcontractor would negotiate directly with LEHR and agree upon a reduced actual price for the subcontractor’s work on the project. LEHR and the subcontractor would further agree upon an inflated purchase order price that would be submitted by LEHR to the CM client. The difference between the inflated purchase order price and the actual negotiated price for the subcontractor’s work constitutes the majority of the money being stolen from the CM client. This process would be repeated with most of the subcontractors working on the project, and subcontractors would “hold” the profits from the inflated bills for Lehr.

LEHR would later recover these stolen monies through several methods, including having subcontractors perform work on GC projects at the reduced rate, thereby increasing Lehr’s profits, or having the subcontractor perform extra work on a particular project at no cost. 

According to documents filed in court, the entire corporate structure of LEHR was involved in this corrupt scheme to one degree or another. Responsibility for the day-to-day operations of the company were equally divided between JEFFREY LAZAR and TODD PHILLIPS. LAZAR primarily supervised the Sales, Estimating, Cost Control and Purchasing Departments, and PHILLIPS supervised those departments involved in construction and finance. The Estimating Department (overseen by STEVEN WASSERMAN) and the Project/Account Executives (overseen by PHILLIPS) decided how much money each “Bid Package” was to be worth. The Purchasing Department negotiated with the various subcontractors to determine how much the purchase orders to the client would be inflated.  Finance Director STEVEN HALPER, through the Accounting Department, recovered significant amounts of unused “Bid Package” money from various subcontractors. The Cost Control and Construction Departments utilized monies “held” by subcontractors in order to reduce the costs of subsequent unrelated projects (both GC and CM). At each step of the process, LEHR put into a place the tools and the instruction needed to commit these crimes.  As detailed in court, a conservative estimate is that over the past 10 years, LEHR has defrauded its clients of more than $30 million.
 
The investigation was a joint endeavor between the Manhattan District Attorney’s Rackets Bureau and a detail of the Special Investigations Unit of the New York State Police (NYSP) assigned to the Bureau. The indictment announced today is the result of ongoing investigations by the District Attorney’s Office into fraud and corruption in the New York City construction industry.

Over the past 10 years, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office has obtained convictions and guilty pleas from scores of individuals, including some of the largest general contractors in New York City, for kickbacks and bid-rigging schemes, and recovered more than $40 million through those prosecutions. 

District Attorney Vance thanked the New York State Police for its assistance in the investigation, including Superintendent Joseph D’Amico, Special Investigation Unit Major Matthew S. Renneman, Lieutenant George Nohai, and lead Investigator Gary Titus, who was supervised by Senior Investigator Gustav Talleur.

Assistant District Attorney Christopher Beard, Senior Investigative Counsel, and Assistant District Attorney Aaron Sato, assigned to the Rackets Bureau, are handling the prosecution of the case under the supervision of Assistant District Attorney Michael Scotto, Chief of the Rackets Bureau and Deputy Chief of the Investigations Division, and Assistant District Attorney Brenda Fischer, Chief of the Labor Investigations and Construction Fraud Unit. Trial Preparation Assistant Dan Murphy assisted with the case. 

Defendant Information:
LEHR CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
New York, NY

Charges:
  • Enterprise Corruption, class B felony, 1 count
  • Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, class C felony, 1 count
  • Money Laundering in the Second Degree, class C felony, 2 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, class C felony, 8 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Third Degree, class D felony, 2 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, class E felony, 1 count
STEVEN HALPER, D.O.B. 6/30/43
Franklin Lakes, NJ
Charges:
  • Enterprise Corruption, class B felony, 1 count
  • Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, class C felony, 1 count
  • Money Laundering in the Second Degree, class C felony, 2 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, class C felony, 8 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Third Degree, class D felony, 2 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, class E felony, 1 count
JEFFREY LAZAR, D.O.B. 3/3/68
New York, NY
Charges:
  • Enterprise Corruption, class B felony, 1 count
  • Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, class C felony, 1 count
  • Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, class C felony, 8 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Third Degree, class D felony, 2 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, class E felony, 1 count
TODD PHILLIPS, D.O.B. 6/7/58
New York, NY
Charges:
  • Enterprise Corruption, class B felony, 1 count
  • Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, class C felony, 1 count
  • Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, class C felony, 8 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Third Degree, class D felony, 2 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, class E felony, 1 count
STEVEN WASSERMAN, D.O.B. 7/14/52
Freeport, NY
Charges:
  • Enterprise Corruption, class B felony, 1 count
  • Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, class C felony, 1 count
  • Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, class C felony, 8 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Third Degree, class D felony, 2 counts
  • Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, class E felony, 1 count
A class B felony is publishable by up to 25 years in prison, a class C felony is punishable by up to 15 years in prison, a class D felony is punishable by up to 7 years in prison, and a class E felony is punishable by up to 4 years in prison. 

[1] The charges contained in the indictments are merely allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...