This is the fourth and final installment in our series on Affirmative Action. Throughout this series, we've explored various facets of this complex and often misunderstood policy. Today, we're tackling the argument that affirmative action is an unnecessary system focused on quotas rather than merit, a perspective often voiced by figures like Candace Owens. Candace Owens argues that affirmative action hinders the most qualified individuals in college admissions and employment, implying it's an obsolete program in a meritocratic society. In an ideal world, her perspective—that merit alone should dictate opportunity—would be a beautiful truth. We could all agree that "the most qualified" should always rise to the top, and programs designed to correct historical imbalances would indeed be unnecessary. However, we are far from inhabiting that ideal world. The reality on the ground paints a very different picture. Despite decades of civil rights advancements...