Skip to main content

Jury Convicts Tax Shelter Promoters of Conspiracy, Tax Crimes

WASHINGTON - Three tax shelter promoters, Peter J. Peggs of Prides Crossing, Mass., Robert D. Larsen of Winter Park, Colo., and Craig M. Stone, formerly of Fort Pierce, Fla., were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States by a federal jury in Grand Rapids, Mich., today following a four-week trial, the Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced. In addition, the jury found Peggs and Larsen guilty of tax evasion.

In October 2007, Peggs, Larsen and Stone were indicted for a scheme to promote, market, sell and administer a fraudulent tax shelter. In March 2008, a superseding indictment was returned charging Anthony Merlo of New Hampshire, a business consultant and partner of Peggs and Larsen; John A. Campbell, a former partner in the Kalamazoo, Mich., office of the law firm of Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone P.L.C.; and Campbell’s client, Oskar RenĂ© Poch of Hickory Corners, Mich., for their roles in the scheme. In April 2008, Campbell, who marketed the fraudulent insurance product; and Poch, who was the owner and operator of Trillium Staffing, an employee-leasing company in Kalamazoo, Mich., pleaded guilty to tax crimes. In May 2009, Merlo pleaded guilty for his role in the scheme.

According to evidence presented during trial, Peggs, Larsen and Stone conspired with Campbell, Merlo and others to defraud the United States by concealing facts and documents from the IRS in their promotion, marketing, sale and administration of sham "Loss of Income" insurance policies through an insurance company in the U.S. Virgin Islands known as Security Trust Insurance Company. The defendants sold these purported insurance policies to wealthy U.S. taxpayers as tax deductible products, with the understanding that the purchasers would have most of their premiums returned to them in a purportedly non-taxable manner. The clients then improperly took tax deductions for the purchase of this sham product and fraudulently reduced their taxable income. During the duration of the conspiracy, more than $12 million in premiums were collected by the promoters of the loss of income policies.

According to evidence presented during trial, Peggs, Larsen and Stone improperly disguised the return of over $3 million of Poch’s companies’ insurance premiums as funds available to Poch in the form of loans that he never repaid from a Michigan bank account in the name of an offshore foreign corporation which Poch paid the defendants to set up in the Bahamas. Moreover, Peggs, Larsen and Stone agreed in e-mails and other documents to conceal facts and documents from the IRS regarding this insurance tax shelter.

According to evidence presented during trial, Peggs and Larsen committed tax evasion by misleading the IRS during its audit of Poch’s tax returns for the years 1999 and 2000. Additionally, Peggs and Larsen lied to the IRS during its audit of Poch’s tax returns in 2002 and 2003. Peggs and Larsen also allegedly made material misrepresentations about the facts

underlying this scheme to Poch’s attorney who was preparing to contest the IRS audit determination in U.S. Tax Court against the IRS.

According to evidence presented during trial, Peggs and Larsen engaged in similar conduct with other clients and individuals in Massachusetts, Ohio and Kentucky. Another individual, Bruce M. Cohen of Louisville, Ky., was convicted in federal courts in both Ohio and Kentucky in connection with his participation in this conspiracy. Cohen, who testified during the trial, is currently serving a 37 month prison sentence for his conduct.

No sentencing date has yet been scheduled. Both the conspiracy and tax evasion convictions carry a maximum punishment of five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.

"The government will continue to unravel schemes promoted and used by taxpayers to evade their federal tax obligations," said John A. DiCicco, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s Tax Division. "As this conviction demonstrates, those who attempt to hide behind fraudulent transactions and foreign corporations as part of their illegal tax schemes will be held accountable."

"Promoting the use of fraudulent loss of income documents for the purpose of taking false tax deductions isn't tax planning; it’s criminal activity," said Eileen Mayer, Chief, IRS Criminal Investigations. "We will continue to shut down fraudulent tax schemes and hold the promoters of these schemes accountable for their actions."

Acting Assistant Attorney General DiCicco commended the investigative efforts of the IRS agents involved in this case, as well as Justice Department Tax Division attorneys, Richard Rolwing, Patrick J. Murray, Jessica Nuzzelillo, who prosecuted the case. Acting Assistant Attorney General DiCicco also thanked the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Grand Rapids, Mich. for their assistance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...