Skip to main content

United States Reaches Agreement in Livestock Trespassing Lawsuit

WASHINGTON— The United States has reached a settlement with ranchers in a longstanding dispute over livestock trespasses on public lands in Nye and Esmeralda Counties, Nev., the Justice Department and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced today.

As part of the settlement, Benjamin J. Colvin and Colvin Cattle Company acknowledged past unauthorized grazing on federal government lands and agreed to comply with federal grazing laws and regulations in the future.

The settlement partially resolves a lawsuit, filed in August 2007 in U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, that alleged the Estate of E. Wayne Hage, Wayne N. Hage, Benjamin J. Colvin and Colvin Cattle Co. intentionally grazed cattle on multiple occasions on federally managed lands and that the Estate of E. Wayne Hage and Wayne N. Hage also placed livestock "leased" from other ranchers onto lands owned by the United States for grazing purposes.

"After many years of disputes and litigation over unauthorized livestock grazing on federal lands in Nevada, we are pleased to reach a settlement that will protect the federal lands from such unauthorized uses in the future," said John C. Cruden, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division.

"The BLM is very pleased that a settlement was reached to resolve the government’s claims against Ben Colvin," said Jerry Smith, District Manager of the Battle Mountain BLM District.

Under the settlement Colvin also paid a fine of $34,000 to fully resolve past grazing and realty trespass damages, and agreed to remove his range improvements from the public lands. Upon Colvin’s compliance with these requirements, the federal government agreed that it will consider Mr. Colvin as it would any other grazing permit applicant in the future.

As a result of the agreement, on Oct 14, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada granted a jointly filed motion for partial dismissal, which dismisses Benjamin J. Colvin and the Colvin Cattle Company from the federal lawsuit as well as a counterclaim filed by Colvin Cattle Company. No settlement has yet been reached with the remaining defendants in this case.

The Bureau of Land Management has the authority to manage, administer, and protect federal lands including regulating grazing under the Taylor Grazing Act of 1934 and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...