Skip to main content

Miriam Mercedes Hernandez of Queens falsely promised to help immigrants secure permanent residency and citizenship

NEW YORK, NY (March 1, 2010) - Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo today announced his office has won a court judgment of more than $3 million against Miriam Mercedes Hernandez of Queens, who targeted and defrauded immigrants out of hundreds of thousands of dollars by promising to help them obtain legal status and then never doing so. The action is the latest in Attorney General Cuomo’s ongoing investigation into immigration fraud.

The judgment is the result of a lawsuit filed by Cuomo in May 2009, claiming Hernandez engaged in fraud and deceptive practices, and violated New York civil rights laws when she falsely promised to assist individuals and families seeking legal status. Hernandez wrongly claimed that she could obtain expedited legal status for people through her alleged relationships with government officials. For her services, Hernandez charged individuals up to $7,500 as an initial fee, and up to $15,000 per person. However, Hernandez never performed the services promised. When the victims requested a refund, Hernandez threatened them and refused to return their money or their documents.

“The court’s decision gives full restitution to victims who trusted this person to help them, and, in the end, were left with little more than lies and false promises,” said Attorney General Cuomo. “The victims in this case had the courage to come forward and help prevent more innocent people from falling prey to this fraud. My office will continue to investigate anyone who seeks to exploit and defraud immigrants.”

As a result of Cuomo’s lawsuit, the New York Supreme Court has ordered Hernandez to pay full restitution to the 37 families who came forward and showed that Hernandez defrauded them. Hernandez must also pay more than $2.8 million dollars in penalties for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law and misrepresenting to the public that she had a special relationship with immigration officials and elected officials. Hernandez is also permanently restricted from directly or indirectly engaging in the business of immigration services.

The lawsuit against Hernandez is the latest stage of Attorney General Cuomo’s ongoing investigation into allegations that immigrants and their families are being targeted for fraudulent and unauthorized immigration-related services in New York. Over the past several months, the Attorney General shut down four businesses for providing legal services to thousands of immigrants without being licensed to do so. Those companies were required to pay more than $100,000 in penalties and were permanently prohibited from operating a business that provides immigration services. Attorney General Cuomo has also sued five organizations for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law and targeting immigrants, and has issued more than 100 subpoenas to businesses and individuals allegedly engaged in unauthorized immigration-related services.

Cesar A. Perales, President and General Counsel of Latino Justice PRLDEF, said, “Attorney General Cuomo has stayed true to his promise to investigate fraud and discrimination and hold scam artists accountable for preying upon and taking advantage of immigrant communities. As a country of immigrants, and as fellow New Yorkers committed to fairness and justice, we should all applaud Attorney General Cuomo for enforcing the law and protecting the disadvantaged. This court ruling is a tremendous achievement.”

Angela Fernandez, Executive Director of the Northern Manhattan Coalition for Immigrant Rights, said, “We were very pleased to see Attorney General Cuomo file this important case and are truly gratified to see the results of his efforts. The enforcement of New York’s laws is critical to protecting immigrant communities from fraud. Scam artists are targeting immigrant communities with false and misleading promises to adjust their immigration status, and Attorney General Cuomo’s efforts are having a meaningful impact in curtailing this type of fraud.”

New Yorkers who believe they have been a victim of immigration assistance fraud are urged to contact the Attorney General’s Immigration Services Fraud Unit Hotline at (866) 390-2992 or visit www.ag.ny.gov.

The case is being handled by Assistant Deputy Counselor Elizabeth De León and Assistant Attorney General Vilda Vera Mayuga, with the assistance of Nydia Shahjahan and Investigator David McManus, under the supervision of Civil Rights Bureau Chief Alphonso B. David and Counsel for Civil Rights Spencer Freedman.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...