Skip to main content

Court Rules That Amerimod and Salvatore Pane, Jr., Fraudulently Charged Homeowners Illegal Fees for Loan Modifications It Never Delivered

NEW YORK, NY (April 13, 2010) - Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo today announced a favorable decision in a lawsuit filed by the Attorney General against American Modification Agency, Inc. (“Amerimod”), formerly one of the largest foreclosure rescue companies in the country, and its owner and president Salvatore Pane, Jr. New York Supreme Court Justice Emily Jane Goodman found that Amerimod and Pane engaged in fraudulent, deceptive, and illegal business practices that violated New York’s consumer protection and real property laws.

“Amerimod shamelessly victimized vulnerable homeowners, and we are pleased the court recognized this,” said Attorney General Cuomo. “With the Court’s decision, Amerimod and its owner will no longer be able to prey on consumers in New York and across the country. My office will continue to pursue relief for those victimized by this company's practices.”

In August 2009, the Attorney General filed a lawsuit against New York-based Amerimod and Pane, after an investigation revealed the company routinely collected illegal upfront fees from homeowners on the brink of foreclosure and then failed to modify their home mortgage loans and lower their monthly mortgage payments as promised. After signing up with Amerimod, consumers often found themselves in worse financial shape with respect to their mortgages. Many were also unable to obtain accurate information from Amerimod’s representatives. The Attorney General’s lawsuit claimed that many of these customers were lured in by the company’s false and deceptive advertising and were not provided legally required disclosures and notices when they signed on with the company. Amerimod, which was headquartered in Uniondale, New York, had more than ten branch offices throughout New York State, as well as offices in various states throughout the United States.

The Court found that the Attorney General conducted a “meticulous investigation” and introduced “a mass of testimony and other evidence” that demonstrated “Amerimod misled its customers concerning its ability to help them modify their mortgages, and did, in fact, fail to make good on its promises.” The Court noted that Amerimod often failed to attend to its customers after customers paid Amerimod’s fee.

The Court also found that Amerimod made numerous false claims in its advertisements, including misrepresenting the number of homes it had saved, falsely claiming to have a 90% to 100% success rate, falsely claiming to be “licensed” by a government agency, and falsely claiming that it was affiliated with “legal experts.”

The Court also ruled that Amerimod violated New York’s distressed property consulting statute, Real Property Law § 265-b, by charging illegal, upfront fees for its loan modification services, failing to provide contracts in the language of its customers, especially Spanish, and failing to provide homeowners with the legally required notice of their right to cancel within five business days.

The decision and order holds Pane personally liable for engaging in fraudulent and illegal acts, noting that Pane appeared in numerous commercials touting Amerimod’s services, approved expenditures and the content of marketing, and made multiple misleading statements to the press.

The Court permanently prohibits Amerimod and Pane from engaging in the illegal, fraudulent, and deceptive business practices and false advertising described in the Attorney General’s petition. The Court also denied a request to lift a temporary restraining order obtained by the Attorney General, freezing bank accounts and other assets. Justice Goodman ordered further proceedings to determine the amount of consumer restitution, costs and fees, and civil penalties.

The Attorney General urges Amerimod customers who have not received a mortgage modification to contact their lender immediately and explore other available resources to assist them with obtaining a modification and avoiding foreclosure. Options include consulting an attorney or a government-approved housing counselor.

A list of not-for-profit housing counselors is available on the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal’s website at www.nysdhcr.gov/Programs/ForeclosurePrevention/CounselListing.htm.

Consumers may also call the Federal Housing Administration at 1-800-CALL-FHA or visit www.fha.gov to obtain foreclosure assistance and for helpful information. In addition, useful information and resources concerning the federal government’s Making Home Affordable refinancing and loan modification programs are available at http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov/.

Amerimod customers who paid for Amerimod’s services but did not receive a loan modification are urged to contact the Attorney General’s Office at 800-771-7755 or visit www.ag.ny.gov to file a complaint.

The lawsuit against Amerimod is part of Cuomo’s wide-ranging investigation into the so-called “foreclosure rescue” industry. To date, the office has entered into settlement agreements with ABM Mitigation Corporation and Raymond, Louis & Fitch, filed lawsuits against National Modification Service and Infinity Mitigation Corporation a.k.a. Infinity Funding Group, and issued subpoenas to approximately 15 other loan modification companies.

The Attorney General urges homeowners to beware of anyone who offers to stop or delay foreclosure for an upfront fee. For more tips, see the Attorney General’s new website www.nyprotectyourhome.com.

The case against Amerimod is being handled by Chief of the Bureau of Consumer Frauds and Protection Joy Feigenbaum and Deputy Bureau Chief Jeffrey K. Powell with Special Counsel Mary Alestra and Assistant Attorney General Brian Montgomery under the supervision of Deputy Attorney General for Economic Justice Michael Berlin and Executive Deputy Attorney General for Economic Justice Maria Vullo.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...