Skip to main content

Kenneth Marsh, the president and owner of Gryphon Holdings Inc., and four Gryphon employees were arrested on charges of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud

Earlier today, Kenneth Marsh, the president and owner of Gryphon Holdings Inc., a purported financial advisory firm located in Staten Island, and four Gryphon employees, Baldwin Anderson, Robert Anthony Budion, Jeanne Lada, and James T. Levier, were arrested on charges of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud.1 The defendants’ initial appearances are scheduled for this afternoon before United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go at the U.S. Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York.

The charges and arrests were announced by Benton J. Campbell, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Ronald J. Verrochio, Inspector-in-Charge, New York Division, United States Postal Inspection Service.

According to the complaint, since approximately January 2007, the defendants and others defrauded victims of more than $17.5 million for fees and investment advisory services. Gryphon victims, many of whom were elderly retirees, typically received unsolicited emails and telephone calls touting the firm’s services and directing them to its website. These communications and the website allegedly contained multiple misrepresentations concerning Gryphon’s employees, services, customers, history, and even the location of its office, including:

• Traders “Michael Warren” and “Kenneth Maseka,” graduates of Harvard, Oxford, Columbia, and Wharton and alumni of Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs, headed the firm, its billion dollar hedge funds, and its legendary trading desk. In fact, “Warren” and “Maseka” are fictional, and the firm has no hedge funds or trading desk.

• [Global financier and philanthropist] George Soros stated that, “Alone the traders of Gryphon Financial are incredible, together the[y] are unstoppable.” Mr. Soros did not make this statement.

• Gryphon operates from offices on Wall Street, London and Sydney. In fact, it is run from a strip-mall on Staten Island.

As alleged in the complaint, once the victims provided contact information, the defendants called and, employing additional misrepresentations and high pressure sales tactics, sold increasingly more expensive versions of Gryphon’s services. Despite Gryphon’s public representations that it was only a publisher of financial newsletters, during the sales calls the victims were fraudulently offered personalized advisory services, including investment recommendations, portfolio analysis, and money management.

“Fair capital markets depend on the protection of the small investor, and we will vigorously investigate and prosecute operators of fraudulent investment advisory schemes that seek to prey on their clients,” stated United States Attorney Campbell. Mr. Campbell expressed his grateful appreciation to the United States Secret Service and the Securities & Exchange Commission for their assistance in the investigation.

Postal Inspector-in-Charge Verrochio stated, “Postal Inspectors will pursue those who would prey on Americans by defrauding them of their hard earned income with phony investment schemes.”

If convicted, the defendants each face a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment.

The government’s case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Roger Burlingame.

The Defendants:



KENNETH MARSH
Age: 43



BALDWIN ANDERSON
Age: 55



ROBERT ANTHONY BUDION
Age: 28



JEANNE LADA
Age: 44



JAMES T. LEVIER
Age: 34



_____________________________

1 The charges announced today are merely allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...