Skip to main content

WELFARE CHEATS STOLE $1 MILLION IN BENEFITS

Brooklyn, NY - April 27, 2010 – Kings County District Attorney Charles J. Hynes, New York City Human Resources Administration Commissioner Robert Doar and New York City Department of Investigation Commissioner Rose Gill Hearn today announced the indictment of 32 people – including business owners, landlords, and real estate developers – charged in separate cases with stealing close to $933,500 in welfare benefits from the city of New York.

“The city’s Human Resources Administration is not there for the personal enrichment of financially secure families who would rather not pay for their own health insurance or groceries, and it is certainly not designed to help drug dealers obtain cheap narcotics,” said District Attorney Hynes. “All these scams and schemes significantly reduce the available funds for those who actually need public assistance. I would like to thank Commissioner Gill Hearn and Commissioner Doar for their help and hard work in investigating these cases.”

“HRA is committed to protecting the integrity of the benefits that we administer,” said HRA Commissioner Doar. “Those who conceal information to obtain benefits for which they are not eligible will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

DOI Commissioner Rose Gill Hearn said, “We cannot afford to waste public money on unscrupulous individuals who conceal substantial assets and income to obtain public assistance. They should know that City investigators and prosecutors are zeroed in and determined to root out these abuses. DOI welcomes this opportunity to stand with District Attorney Hynes and Commissioner Doar and their staffs in our joint commitment to this effort.”

The largest theft is charged to Liz Sobeida, 37, who collected $460,000 in Medicaid benefits for herself and her two children, between 2004 and 2009. Sobeida is charged with claiming to be a single mother on assistance applications, when in fact, her husband, with whom she lived, was employed as a technician at a Cadillac dealership – earning $70,000 in 2009 – and she worked at Brooks Brothers.

Another defendant, Marlowe Gershenson, 35, is charged with collecting $63,000 in Medicaid benefits, over the course of six years, despite the fact that her husband, with whom she lives and owns property, owns a clothing wholesale manufacturing company – AV Denim – and a real estate business, MDK Leasing. At one point in 2007, her husband’s checking account had a balance of over $110,000, and on an automobile loan application – she owns a Bentley Coupe and a Land Rover SUV – she claimed annual earnings of $500,000, according to the indictment.

Ariel, 31, and Joyce Soudry, 28, are charged with stealing $59,000 in Medicaid benefits over five years, while their bank balance exceeded $2.2 million. The couple’s real estate companies own and manage rental properties and develop condominiums in Long Branch, NJ and in Brooklyn. They currently make payments on three luxury cars, including one Mercedes.

Shawana Kennedy, AKA Shawana Wade, 33, is charged with stealing $55,000 in Medicaid and Food Stamp assistance during a five-year period. On applications she claimed to be a single mother, when in fact, she lives with her husband, the father of her children, who works for the city Sanitation Department.

The District Attorney’s Public Assistance Crimes Unit recently secured a felony conviction, for Attempted Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree and Criminal Use of a Public Benefit Card, against a defendant who sold the use of his benefits card for $10, so it could fill a forged prescription for a controlled substance. He faces two to four years, when he is sentenced May 11.

Also charged in the cases announced today are 11 defendants who either forged drug prescriptions or allowed others to use the defendants’ Medicaid cards to bill Medicaid for forged prescriptions totaling $13,000.

Of the 32 cases announced today, nine defendants live in Nassau County, Westchester County or New Jersey, but are charged with using fake addresses on Medicaid applications, to claim they lived in Brooklyn and steal approximately $182,000 in benefits.

The cases are being prosecuted by Assistant District Attorneys Frank Dudis, Chin-Ho Cheng, John Vourderis and Sabrina Thanse. Lauren Mack is Chief of the Public Assistance Crimes Bureau.

Contact: Jonah Bruno
(718) 250-2300

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...