Skip to main content

GREGORY TOMLINSON, a computer software engineer,Has been Indicted in connection with his unauthorized access and duplication of certain computer software files owned by his employer, AOL, Inc.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictment of GREGORY TOMLINSON, a computer software engineer, in connection with his unauthorized access and duplication of certain computer software files owned by his employer, AOL, Inc.[1] TOMLINSON has been charged in a 35-count indictment with Grand Larceny, Unlawful Duplication of Computer Related Materials, Computer Tampering, and Computer Trespass.

“Computer trespass and commercial espionage are a billion-dollar international problem,” said District Attorney Vance. “Oftentimes, hackers and other internal employees access sensitive material for unlawful and inappropriate purposes. I commend our new Cybercrime and Identity Theft Bureau for acting swiftly to contain the threat and seize the computer evidence. Attempts to steal or hack computer data will be aggressively prosecuted by this office.”

According to documents filed in court, TOMLINSON was a software engineer employed by AOL. On October 26, 2009, he gave approximately two-weeks notice of his intent to quit his job with AOL; his resignation was to be effective on November 6, 2009. On November 2, 2009, TOMLINSON accessed proprietary computer code owned by AOL without permission or authority to do so. Internal security systems at AOL were tripped by TOMLINSON and alerted when he accessed the software code in question, and access logs tracked his actions within the company’s network. AOL records reveal that TOMLINSON made repeated unauthorized modifications to an AOL Website under development, which subsequently allowed him to access, view, and duplicate at least seven computer files containing proprietary software code used by AOL to publish and support Website content.

According to court documents, a search warrant executed at TOMLINSON's residence in Brooklyn at the time of his arrest on March 10, 2010, resulted in the recovery of computer equipment and copies of the proprietary computer code on a USB-flash drive.

Assistant District Attorney Jeremy Glickman, Deputy Chief of the Cybercrime and Identity Theft Bureau, is handling the prosecution under the supervision of Assistant District Attorney David Szuchman, Chief of the Cybercrime and Identity Theft Bureau.

District Attorney Vance thanked the New York City Police Department, Computer Crime Squad, specifically Lieutenant Dennis Lane, Detective Dennis Dragos, and Detective Richard Macnamara for assisting in the investigation. District Attorney Vance also thanked representatives of AOL, Inc., for their assistance and cooperation in this investigation.

Defendant Information:

GREGORY TOMLINSON, 4/1/1980
200 Schermerhorn Street
Brooklyn, NY

Charges:

* Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, seven counts, class E felony
* Unlawful Duplication of Computer Related Materials, seven counts, class E felony
* Computer Tampering in the Third Degree, seven counts, class E felony
* Computer Trespass, fourteen counts, class E felony

A class E felony is punishable by 1 1/3 to 4 years in prison.

[1] The charges contained in the indictments are merely allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...