Skip to main content

JOHN F. HAGGERTY, JR., and SPECIAL ELECTION OPERATIONS, LLC ("SEO"), Have Been Indicted for stealing approximately $1.1 million Dollars

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictment of JOHN F. HAGGERTY, JR., 41, and SPECIAL ELECTION OPERATIONS, LLC ("SEO"), for stealing approximately $1.1 million from Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg[1]. The defendants have been charged with Grand Larceny, Money Laundering and Falsifying Business Records. District Attorney Vance also announced the filing of a civil forfeiture action against HAGGERTY and SEO, seeking forfeiture of assets in the amount of $1.1 million and the seizure of HAGGERTY's personal residence, which he purchased with stolen money.

The crimes charged in the indictment began in the late summer of 2009, when HAGGERTY was a volunteer for Mayor Bloomberg's campaign for reelection. HAGGERTY falsely represented to Mayor Bloomberg's agents and campaign workers that he would arrange for nearly $1.1 million to be spent on an Election Day ballot security and poll watching operation, to be run through the New York State Independence Party. Relying on those false representations, Mayor Bloomberg's agents approved a contribution of $1.1 million of his personal funds to the Party's housekeeping account in order to fund the operation. In reality, neither HAGGERTY nor SEO made any expenditure in connection with ballot security and poll watching for Election Day 2009. For its part, the Party spent less than $32,000.

"This case is about theft and greed, but it is also about transparency and the integrity of the electoral process," said District Attorney Vance. "Haggerty grossly abused his position within the campaign that trusted him with important matters. At a time when the public is particularly distrusting about our state government processes, his use of a shell company to conceal his involvement from the public simply further breeds cynicism."

According to the indictment, defendant SPECIAL ELECTION OPERATIONS, LLC, was purported to be a vendor for the Election Day operation, to be paid for extensive work by the Independence Party. At the time the work needed to be done, the company had not even been created, and Mayor Bloomberg and his campaign staff did not know about its purported existence or its alleged involvement in the Election Day operation. According to the indictment, HAGGERTY created the company on December 3, 2009 - a month after Election Day - and within days opened a bank account in the company's name. On December 11, 2009, the Party wired $750,000 from its housekeeping account to the SPECIAL ELECTION OPERATIONS account. HAGGERTY then used approximately $600,000 of the stolen funds to purchase a home.

After Election Day, HAGGERTY tried to conceal his theft and laundering of the money by falsely telling Mayor Bloomberg's campaign workers that he had actually made significant expenditures on ballot security and poll watching. To corroborate those false claims, HAGGERTY presented a campaign representative with three bogus paychecks for poll watchers.

The asset forfeiture suit filed today seeks $1.1 million in forfeiture from Haggerty and SEO, and includes the forfeiture of the house that Haggerty bought with the stolen money.

District Attorney Vance thanked Assistant District Attorney Eric Seidel, Chief of the Rackets Bureau, who handled the case with the assistance of Assistant District Attorneys Vanessa Richards, Sally Pritchard and Brian P. Weinberg, Supervising Financial Investigator Matthew Paul, and paralegals Nora Lessersohn and Jordana Loeb. District Attorney Vance thanked Tara Christie Miner, Chief of the Asset Forfeiture Unit, for her work on the case. The District Attorney also thanked Investigators Donato Siciliano and Jonathan Reid, who worked on the investigation under the supervision of Acting Chief Investigator Walter Alexander.

Defendant Information:

JOHN F. HAGGERTY, JR., 1/12/1969
115 Greenway Avenue North,
Forest Hills, NY 11375

SPECIAL ELECTION OPERATIONS, LLC
121 State Street, 3rd Floor
Albany, NY 12207

Charges:

* Grand Larceny in the First Degree, a class B felony, punishable by up to 25 years in prison.

* Money Laundering in the Second Degree, a class C felony, punishable by up to 15 years in prison.

* Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree (three counts), a class E felony, punishable by up to 4 years in prison.

[1]Charges contained the indictment are merely allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...