Skip to main content

Luis M. Batista, a former New York City Police Department detective, was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment

Earlier today, Luis M. Batista, a former New York City Police Department detective, was sentenced by United States District Judge Dora L. Irizarry at the federal courthouse in Brooklyn to 15 years of imprisonment for his convictions, following trial, of conspiracy to distribute narcotics, bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud, and obstruction of justice.

The sentence was announced by Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, George Venizelos, Acting Assistant Director-in-Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office, and Raymond W. Kelly, Commissioner, New York City Police Department.

Batista joined the NYPD in 1997 and worked in Manhattan as an undercover narcotics officer and later as a precinct detective in the 90th Precinct in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn. The evidence at trial established that not long after beginning employment with the NYPD, Batista befriended Virgilio “Checo” Hiciano, the operator of a large-scale cocaine and crack enterprise that controlled the block that included its primary sales location at 441 Wilson Avenue. Batista assisted the enterprise by, among other things, warning Hiciano of impending police actions and providing him with information from law enforcement databases. Hiciano testified against Batista at trial after pleading guilty, pursuant to a cooperation agreement, to narcotics, firearms, and bail jumping charges. Hiciano has not yet been sentenced.

In 2006, after members of the enterprise were arrested, Batista suspected that he himself might be under investigation. Batista confirmed that suspicion after corruptly persuading a member of the NYPD’s Internal Affairs Bureau to access a secure IAB database and provide the substance of a report detailing information about Batista and Hiciano’s relationship. Batista then obstructed justice by falsely reporting that Hiciano was his confidential source, attempting to persuade his supervisor to corroborate that false report, and attempting to intimidate a member of the enterprise whom Batista suspected was cooperating with the government.

The evidence at trial also established that Batista forged documents that enabled his brother to obtain a $382,500 mortgage from Metropolitan Credit Union for a residence located in Nassau County.

In addition to Batista and Hiciano, the government has obtained narcotics convictions against eight other members of the enterprise.

In announcing the sentence, Ms. Lynch extended her grateful appreciation to the FBI and NYPD, the agencies responsible for conducting the government’s investigation.

The government’s case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Lee J. Freedman, Cristina M. Posa, and Anthony M. Capozzolo.

The Defendant:



LUIS M. BATISTA
Age: 37

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...