Skip to main content

Companies operated by Thomas Guida charged families thousands of dollars to transport public school students throughout NYC, then abruptly shut down with little notice

NEW YORK, N.Y. (October 6, 2010) -- Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo today announced a lawsuit against several related Queens-based school bus companies that collected advance payments to provide transportation for public school students, then abruptly terminated service and failed to provide promised refunds. The actions left many families stranded without transportation services to get their children to and from school.

According to the Attorney General’s lawsuit, Thomas Guida and the various bus companies he operated (Bronx Science Bus Service, Inc., Bronx Science Express, Inc., Gagnon Bus Company, Inc. and Hunter Express Bus Service, Inc.) entered into contracts with hundreds of parents of public high school students to provide daily transportation to Bronx High School of Science, Hunter College High School and Lehman College High School of American Studies. Parents purchased such services so their children could avoid relying on lengthy daily commutes via public transportation. The typical annual fee was more than $2,000 per student. The bus companies’ advertisements promised new high-tech buses and superior service, and customers were encouraged to sign up early and prepay in-full to take advantage of a discounted rate.

“Parents were promised that their children were getting a reliable ride to school but instead were left scrambling to find alternative transportation,” said Attorney General Cuomo. “When the company abruptly shut down, it failed to provide refunds or adequately explain itself. My office is fighting on behalf of hundreds of families who paid good money for a service and were then ripped off.”

Attorney General Cuomo’s lawsuit claims that the bus companies collected more than $1 million from parents of approximately 500 students for service during the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 school years. However, halfway through the 2008-2009 school year, the bus companies abruptly terminated service, stranding hundreds of Queens students. Complainants also stated that the companies, when in operation, sometimes used rented vans instead of buses, were frequently late in picking up and dropping off students, and that the buses were unreliable and often broke down.

As described in papers filed by the Attorney General’s Office, the companies issued “special notices” of the shutdown to the families giving several reasons for failing to provide service, including claiming that the bus fleet was “victimized by arsonists” and rendered “un-useable.”

After terminating services, the companies shut down and could not be reached by consumers.

Attorney General Cuomo’s lawsuit, filed in New York State Supreme Court, seeks restitution for the aggrieved customers, plus penalties and costs. The suit names Guida individually and as principal officer of Bronx Science Express, Inc., which did business as Jim Gagnon’s Bronx Science Express, Inc., and Gagnon’s Bronx Science Express, Inc.

Attorney General Cuomo urges consumers who believe they have been a victim of fraud to contact his office at 800-771-7755 or visit www.ag.ny.gov

The case is being handled by Assistant Attorney General Roberto G. Lebron under the supervision of Assistant Attorney General-in-Charge of the Harlem Regional Office Guy H. Mitchell, Special Deputy Attorney General of Consumer Frauds & Protection Joy Feigenbaum, Consumer Frauds Deputy Bureau Chief Jeffrey Powell, Deputy Attorney General for Economic Justice Michael Berlin and Executive Deputy Attorney General for Economic Justice Maria Vullo.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...