Skip to main content

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF JONATHAN SHAW ON ILLEGAL WEAPONS CHARGES

87 Illegal Weapons and More Than 2,800 Rounds of Ammunition Recovered from Defendant's Storage Locker

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictment and arraignment of JONATHAN SHAW, 57, for illegally owning, storing, and attempting to transport dozens of weapons, including multiple loaded firearms, and large quantities of ammunition. The defendant was charged in an 89-count indictment with Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second Degree and Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree,[1] among other charges.

“The events of this past weekend remind us that gun violence continues to plague our nation. The defendant’s illegal weapons cache endangered workers and customers at the storage facility and in the entire community,” said District Attorney Vance. “This Office will aggressively pursue charges against illegal weapons owners and dealers, and seek out stockpiles of illegal weapons to get them off our streets.”

According to documents filed in court, on November 6, 2010, employees of First Global Express (“FGE”) met SHAW at a Manhattan Mini Storage facility at 220 South Street, having been contracted by the defendant to assist in shipping his personal property and items contained in the storage locker to his new address in Los Angeles, California. When FGE employees saw that the defendant had ammunition and firearms in his belongings, FGE contacted police.

Responding officers from the NYPD Firearms Investigation Unit removed the following from the defendant’s duffel bag: a Norinco AK-47 assault weapon loaded with 31 rounds of ammunition, a Mossberg 12 gauge pump-action pistol-grip shotgun, and a loaded .30 caliber semiautomatic rifle.

A search warrant was then obtained and executed, enabling law enforcement authorities, including investigators from the District Attorney’s Office’s Violent Criminal Enterprises Unit, to search the remainder of the defendant’s shipment. According to documents filed in court, the following weapons were uncovered: a loaded British military rifle and an air rifle; more than 2,800 rounds of ammunition of various makes and calibers, including approximately 110 additional rounds of ammunition for the Norinco AK-47, shells of ammunition for the pump-action pistol-grip shotgun, rounds of ammunition for the .30 caliber semiautomatic rifle, and rounds of ammunition for several different handguns; a total of 83 knives, 68 of which are classified as illegal, including 66 switchblades and two gravity knives, two daggers, one bayonet, and other assorted knives; five sets of metal knuckles; eight expandable batons; two leather blackjacks; and five blank-firing handguns.

According to city records, SHAW has never owned a rifle permit or firearms license in New York. The investigation into this case is ongoing.

Assistant District Attorney Christopher Prevost is handling the prosecution of the case under the supervision of Assistant District Attorney Christopher Ryan, Chief of the Violent Criminal Enterprise Unit; Assistant District Attorney John Irwin, Deputy Chief of the Trial Division; and Executive Assistant District Attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo, Chief of the Trial Division.



Defendant Information:

JONATHAN SHAW, D.O.B. 7/5/1953
New York, NY

Charges:

Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second Degree, a class C felony, 3 counts
Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree, a class A misdemeanor, 83 counts
Unlawful Possession of a Rifle, an Administrative Code misdemeanor, 1 count
Unlawful Possession of Ammunition, an Administrative Code misdemeanor, 2 counts

A class C felony is punishable by up to 15 years in prison, a class A misdemeanor is punishable by up to one year in jail, and these Administrative Code misdemeanors are punishable by up to one year in jail.

[1] The charges contained in the indictments are merely allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...