Skip to main content

Jury Convicts Gallery Director Leigh Morse For Scamming Four Estates Out of Approximately $5 Million

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the conviction of LEIGH MORSE, 55, the director of the Salander-O'Reilly Galleries, for her participation in a large-scale art fraud scheme that victimized the estates of four artists. Following a month-long trial, a jury in New York State Supreme Court today found the defendant guilty of Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree. As proven at trial, MORSE fraudulently sold more than 80 artworks from four estates without notifying them.

"The defendant, together with her accomplice, convicted art gallery owner LAWRENCE SALANDER, systematically looted the estates of her clients over a period of many years," said District Attorney Vance. "Because the art industry is largely unregulated, it is particularly important to hold accountable those who fraudulently handle works of art entrusted to them. I'd like to thank the prosecutors and investigators who pursued justice for these victims, and also the members of the jury for their service."

As proven at trial, MORSE began working at the SALANDER-O'REILLY GALLERIES in 1995. During her 12 years at the gallery, MORSE sold many works of art from several estates represented by the gallery. In her position, she earned the trust of the estates that turned over possession of their inherited art for the gallery to exhibit and sell. As numerous problems came to light, MORSE was contacted directly by several estates and made aware of the issues they had involving the location, status, and payment of works they consigned to the gallery.

As director and on many occasions as the primary contact for the estates, MORSE was well aware of the true status of many of the works about which the estates had inquired. This information included the sale or payment status on numerous works she personally sold months and even years prior, and for which she earned a commission. However, rather than communicate the truthful information to the respective estates, MORSE intentionally misled them or failed to disclose the true status of their works. By not informing the estates that their works were sold, in one case almost a decade earlier, MORSE prevented the estates from demanding payment for those sales or having the ability to make an informed decision about removing their remaining works from the gallery. In the meantime, MORSE continued to sell works consigned to the gallery from these and other estates. As a dealer and the director of the gallery, MORSE's conduct violated both the trust and the consignment relationship with those estates.

On March 18, 2010, MORSE's co-defendant, LAWRENCE SALANDER, pleaded guilty to 30 counts of grand larceny and other charges relating to the approximately $120 million complex art fraud undertaken by SALANDER and SALANDER-O'REILLY GALLERIES. He was sentenced on August 3, 2010, to 6 to 18 years in state prison and $120 million in restitution to 30 victims.

MORSE is scheduled to be sentenced on June 3, 2011.

District Attorney Vance thanked Assistant District Attorneys Micki Shulman Hendricks, Deputy Chief of the Major Economic Crimes Bureau, and Kenn Kern, Deputy Chief of the Cybercrime and Identity Theft Bureau, for prosecuting the case under the supervision of Assistant District Attorney Richard Weber, Chief of the Major Economic Crimes Bureau, and Executive Assistant District Attorney Adam S. Kaufmann, Chief of the Investigation Division. Trial Preparation Assistants Geehyun Sussan Lee and R. Patrick Wyllie and assisted with the case.

Defendant Information:

LEIGH MORSE, D.O.B. 3/26/1956
New York, NY

Charges:

Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, a class E felony, one count

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...