Skip to main content

Today's Quote: Looking for a Lawyer? 'Ware the Shirt and Tie Scam!

"He walked around wearing a shirt and tie … and identified himself as a lawyer, I'm sure others may have fallen for his scam," said Broward Sheriff's Office Economic Crimes Detective John Calabro. Excerpt from "North Lauderdale man arrested on charge of impersonating lawyer" (Orlando Sentinel)


But I think the "sophisticated" touch that "impressed" even the detective was the business card identifying the alleged thief and impersonator as "Dr." - as well as "Ph.D., E. JD Attorney at Law."

Okay, I'll confess my ignorance. I had to look up EJD, which I think stands for Executive Juris Doctor, or worse...

(You might want to stop reading here, because the rest of the post, which was just supposed to contain the one quote, is about the addictive nature of Google and the many virtual roads you can choose to travel if you can't just walk away from your computer at 11 p.m.)


Lawyer Central has a "verified" profile for an individual in the Ft. Lauderdale, Florida area with the same name and initials as the accused (I need to get out more 'cause I didn't know there was a Who's Who in the World), with a link to a business website for an individual with the same name and even more initials, i.e. J.S.D.-MD.R. (the last being a very versatile acronym, my fave being Miniature Donkey Registry.) The site shares links to almost 40 impressive institutions, including MIT, the Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies (which at first I thought was for astronauts but after attempting to speed-read the site, now have no idea who it's for), the National Republican Congressional Committee, FindLaw and yep, the Florida Sheriffs Association. The site states the individual is registered and good standing with the listed organizations, as well as The Florida Bar (a lawyer search for this name yielded no results, at least not as of the time of this post).

Word to the wise, it's always a seriously bad sign when your lawyer's website has Google banner ads at the top.

According to the Orlando Sentinel, the alleged victim began to suspect his lawyer's credentials when he spotted him looking intoxicated at a bus stop - and when a paralegal also said he wasn't a lawyer. The alleged victim filed a complaint with The Florida Bar, which in turn notified the local sheriff's office.

Despite the suit and tie, but probably with the help of the initials and jaw-dropping credentials, the possessor of the alleged multiple doctorates has been charged with two felonies, grand theft and UPL, and as of the date the news article was published, was being held on $10,000 bond.

On the bright side, at least this guy didn't tell anyone he was a paralegal.

Source: Orlando Sentinel

Reprinted with permission of Lynne J. DeVenny, Author/Blogger at Practical Paralegalism, http://www.practicalparalegalism.com/.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...