Skip to main content

EEOC Settles Sexual Discrimination Lawsuit Against Acclaim Academy

PHOENIX – A Phoenix charter school will pay $41,125 and furnish other relief to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

The EEOC’s suit alleged that Rafael Andaverde, the husband of the owner and director of ACCLAIM Charter School, doing business as ACCLAIM Academy, sexually harassed at least two female school employees. Andaverde’s illegal conduct continued even after complaints about it were made to the administration, the EEOC said.

Such alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. ACCLAIM Charter School d/b/a ACCLAIM Academy, Case No. 2:10-cv-02102-GMS) in U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona in Phoenix, after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.

“Employees have an absolute right to be free from sexual harassment in the workplace,” said EEOC Regional Attorney Mary Jo O’Neill. “There simply is no basis for tolerating such misconduct in the workplace today. Unfortunately, it continues to be a recurring problem.”

In addition to the monetary payment, the settlement includes a consent decree entered by the court which requires ACCLAIM Academy to revise policies and provide training to all employees about sex discrimination, including sexual harassment. The decree further provides that the harasser will not be hired by the school or be on premises when females or children are present. Further, all employees will also have serious warnings about the possibility of discipline if there is a recurrence of the misconduct.
ACCLAIM will also be enjoined for four years from retaliating or otherwise violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. ACCLAIM will also be required to ensure that its policies reflect the law against sex discrimination.

EEOC District Director Rayford O. Irvin said, “We will continue to vigorously pursue our mission of fighting employment discrimination on all fronts. Employers must be educated that sexual harassment in the workplace should not be tolerated. It is clearly less costly for an employer to operate within the law.”
EEOC Trial Attorney Guy Knoller added, “ACCLAIM Academy caused employees emotional distress by allowing a hostile work environment to be created and then continue. Mr. Andaverde’s conduct should have been curtailed even though he was married to the director and owner of the school.”

EEOC’s Phoenix District Office has jurisdiction for Arizona, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and part of New Mexico (including Albuquerque).

The EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws against employment discrimination. Further information is available at www.eeoc.gov.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...