Skip to main content

A.G. SCHNEIDERMAN SUES BUFFALO AUTO DEALER FOR SCAMMING CONSUMERS

BUFFALO - Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman today announced the filing of felony charges against Laurence Sessum III, owner of Maxx Auto Sales, a now defunct dealership that ripped off Western New Yorkers.  To protect Sessum's customers, Schneiderman also filed a civil lawsuit against Sessum and obtained an order freezing his assets.  Sessum is accused of taking more than $100,000 in payments from dozens of consumers for vehicles he never delivered. 

It is believed that Sessum collected the payments from consumers to raise money to make restitution for a previous conviction. Prior to the Attorney General's investigation, Sessum was prosecuted by the Erie County District Attorney for a separate crime. In that case, he pleaded guilty to stealing more than $500,000 from the New York State Tax Department. In order to avoid jail time, the court informed Sessum that if he paid $50,000 in restitution, the court would be inclined to give him probation.

"New Yorkers should be able to rest assured that when they buy a car, they will be legally protected and the transaction will be above board," said Attorney General Schneiderman. "This is a case of robbing Peter to pay Paul, where money was taken from consumers and used to pay off a previous crime. I am committed to using all of our legal tools to stop crime sprees like this in its tracks."
Sessum is charged with one count of Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, four counts of Grand Larceny in the Third Degree and one count of Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree.  If convicted, Sessum could be incarcerated for up to two and one-half to seven years.

The Attorney General's investigation, which began April 2011, revealed that Sessum operated a "buy here-pay here" used car dealership called Maxx Auto Sales, located at 2780 Bailey Avenue in Buffalo.   Dozens of consumers filed complaints with Schneiderman's office stating they had made down payments and/or payments in full but never received their vehicles.

The District Attorney's investigation discovered that from February 29, 2005 through August 31, 2009, Sessum stole $503,786.12 in sales tax money from the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance.  The funds were paid to him by consumers.  He was prosecuted by the DA and on December 20, 2010, he pled guilty to a felony and paid $50,000 in restitution.  The sentencing court advised Sessum that it would be inclined to sentence Sessum to probation if he paid $50,000 in restitution on his sentencing date.
According to the court papers, to obtain that $50,000 payment, Sessum again resorted to criminal behavior.  Sessum took more than $100,000 in payments from dozens of consumers on the promise to deliver motor vehicles to them, but never did. 

Sessum's alleged deceptive business practices include the following:
  • If a consumer purchased the vehicle from Sessum's lot, he told the consumer that the vehicle would be ready for delivery shortly, citing the need to service the vehicle.  But the vehicles were never ready nor delivered to the buyer.   
  • If Sessum did not have the vehicle the consumer wanted on the lot, he promised he could get it if the consumer made a down payment.  He did not make good on his promises. 
  • Sessum "sold" vehicles that he did not own.
  • Sessum sold the same vehicles more than once. 
After getting enough money to pay the restitution, Sessum abruptly shut his dealership down leaving dozens of consumers without down payments and vehicles.

The criminal case against Sessum is being handled by Assistant Attorneys General Cydney A. Kelly and Paul F. McCarthy under the direction of Gail Heatherly, Chief of the Criminal Prosecutions Bureau.  The civil case is being handled by Assistant Attorney General James Morrissey with the assistance of Senior Consumer Frauds Representative Karen Davis, under the direction of Assistant Attorney General In-Charge of the Buffalo Regional Office, Michael J. Russo and Executive Deputy Attorney General for Regional Affairs, Martin J. Mack.  The case was referred to this office by the New York State Police.  The investigation was assisted by the New York State Police Special Investigations Unit in Buffalo.

The Attorney General acknowledges the Erie County District Attorney, Frank A. Sedita, III, who prosecuted Sessum for failing to pay the New York sales tax he collected to the New York Department of Taxation and Finance.

The current charges against Sessum are allegations. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...