Skip to main content

Teacher, Threatened & Fired, Can Sue School

By JOSEPH CELENTINO

CHICAGO (CN) - School officials may be liable for firing a math teacher who brought criminal charges after a student threatened to stab him, the 7th Circuit ruled.

The student, who is not named in the complaint, and his family apparently had a history of disturbances at Harvard Junior High School, in the small Illinois town of the same name.

Sean Gschwind, a sixth-grade math teacher, said he met with the boy's parents twice in December 2005 over threats that the boy had made to one classmate, and a fight that the boy had with yet another student.

The boy's older brother had once assaulted the assistant principal. During the second meeting, the boy's father threatened to sue Gschwind and said his older son should have beat up Gschwind instead of the assistant principal.

A few weeks later, during a game of "math karaoke" in Gschwind's class, the student gave a rendition of the gangsta rap song "Boyz in Da Hood," then added the line: "I stabbed Gschwind."

Disturbed, Gschwind ended the class and spoke to the school's police liaison and then principal Linda Heiden.

Gschwind later filed a criminal complaint, and the student, who was 12 or 13 years old at the time, was charged with disorderly conduct. The school suspended him for two days.

Heiden and the assistant principal, however, did not want Gchwind to file the complaint because they worried that the student's parents would sue.

Soon after, the assistant principal, Frank Shields, gave Gschwind an "unsatisfactory" performance evaluation, who had otherwise always received positive reports.

The new evaluation criticized Gschwind for a "lack of interpersonal skills in relating to students, parents, and colleagues."

The school then told Gschwind to resign, or else Heiden would recommend that the Board of Education not renew his teaching contract.

Gschwind resigned, and the school does not deny that he was constructively discharged.

When Gschwind sued the district, Heiden and Shields for retaliation, but a federal judge in Rockford granted the defendants summary judgment after finding that Gschwind's criminal complaint was not protected First Amendment speech.

The federal appeals court reversed last week.

"Violence in schools is a subject in which the public these days is highly interested, with the added twist in this case, which would amplify the public's interest, that the father of the student who made the threat appears to have endorsed it," Judge Richard Posner wrote for the three-member panel. "Nevertheless the plaintiff in filing the criminal complaint might have had no interest in making a public statement about school violence, but have only wanted to deter further threats against himself."

Gschwind's actions clearly invoked the public interest in preventing violence in schools, according to the decision.

"We are mindful - have indeed emphasized - that academic administrators are entitled, in the name of academic freedom and efficient educational administration, to a considerable degree of judicial forbearance in matters of discipline," Posner wrote.

"But Illinois law has curtailed that discretion in respects directly relevant to this case by requiring that any incident of battery or intimidation ... in a school be reported immediately to law enforcement authorities," he added.

Though the public cannot access juvenile court records under state law, the court would not let that weigh against qualifying Gschwind's complaint as speech.

"It is true that the records are sealed ... but that doesn't preclude the victim of a juvenile crime, or anyone else for that matter (us judges for example), from talking about the crime, whether privately or in public," Posner wrote.

The 7th Circuit reversed summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Source: Courthouse News Service

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

Mortgage Fraud

Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau announced today the indictment of 13 individuals and a mortgage origination company for perpetrating over $100 million in mortgage fraud over a four-year period in the New York City metropolitan area. In addition, 12 individuals have already waived indictment and pleaded guilty to felonies relating to their participation in the mortgage fraud scheme. The indictment charges 13 individuals and the mortgage company, AFG FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., with enterprise corruption, grand larceny, scheme to defraud and conspiracy involving 19 fraudulent mortgage transactions. The defendants include the principals and a number of employees of the mortgage company, as well as bank employees, appraisers, and three attorneys. Two other attorneys are among the defendants who already pleaded guilty. The crimes charged in the indictment occurred between June 2004 and April 2009 with the bulk of the fraudulent closings occurring from mid-2005 through the end of...

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF SIX SUBCONTRACTING COMPANIES AND THEIR OWNERS IN MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR FRAUD

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictments of six subcontracting companies and their owners for colluding with LEHR CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (LEHR) in a multimillion dollar scheme that defrauded numerous construction clients over the past decade. See, related story. The announcement comes one day after DA Vance announced LEHR and four executives were indicted on crimes including Enterprise Corruption, the New York State Racketeering law. GODSELL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and its owner ARTHUR GODSELL are charged with Grand Larceny in the Second Degree. JT ROSELLE LIGHTING, INC. and its owner JAMES ROSELLE, LIBERTY CONTRACTING CORPORATION and its owners GEORGE FOTIADIS and KEVIN FOTIADIS, PJ MECHANICAL and its owner JAMES PAPPAS, SUPERIOR ACOUSTICS, INC. and its owner KENNETH MCGUIGAN, and SWEENEY & HARKIN CARPENTRY and its owner MICHAEL HAYES are charged with Grand Larceny in the Third Degree.[1] "The defendants in this case cheated clie...