Skip to main content

Two Tax Preparers Plead Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court To Tax Fraud And Identity Theft Conspiracy

DOLORES TEJADA and NORMA JIMENEZ, Manhattan-based tax preparers, pled guilty today in Manhattan federal court to charges related to their participation in a scheme to file false tax returns using stolen identities. TEJADA and JIMENEZ pled guilty before U.S. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara stated: “Dolores Tejada and Norma Jimenez were full-service fraudsters – furnishing stolen identities to their clients, preparing their fraudulent tax returns, and in some cases, even cashing their refund checks. To top it off, Tejada attempted to obstruct the investigation. Identity theft-related tax refund fraud victimizes the people whose identities are stolen, costs the IRS hundreds of millions of dollars every year, and is unfair to all the law abiding citizens who pay their fair share of taxes, and it will not be tolerated.”
IRS-CI Acting Special Agent-in-Charge Toni Weirauch stated:

“IRS Criminal Investigation has made investigating refund fraud and identity theft top priorities. The filing of fraudulent tax returns using stolen names and social security numbers can result in significant harm to those individuals whose identities were stolen, as well as a monetary loss for the U.S. Treasury and thus, the taxpaying public.”

According to the Superseding Indictment filed in this case, statements made during the plea proceedings, and other court documents filed in Manhattan federal court:
TEJADA and JIMENEZ ran tax preparation and multiservice businesses out of the same storefront building. In one of their joint fraud schemes, TEJADA sold stolen identities belonging to third-parties to customers at her business, and the customers would then list those third-parties as dependents or childcare providers on their tax returns. TEJADA would then send the customers to JIMENEZ’s business, Coastland Insurance, for the preparation of false tax returns claiming deductions for the fraudulent dependents and childcare providers. In another fraud scheme, JIMENEZ prepared tax returns in the names of individuals without their knowledge, using a private mailbox owned and maintained by TEJADA as the return address. The resulting refund checks were then cashed.

TEJADA also obstructed the investigation of her crimes by threatening a former customer and repeatedly instructing him to lie to IRS agents.

TEJADA, 59, pled guilty to one count of aggravated identity theft, one count of conspiracy to commit tax fraud, and one count of witness tampering. She faces a maximum sentence of 27 years in prison and a minimum sentence of two years in prison, and is scheduled to be sentenced by U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon on January 24, 2013 at 2:45 p.m.

JIMENEZ, 58, pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit tax fraud and 30 substantive counts of tax fraud. She faces a maximum sentence of 95 years in prison, and is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge McMahon on January 24, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...