Skip to main content

President of Investment Fund Pleads Guilty in Manhattan Federal Court to Perpetrating $2 Million Ponzi Scheme

Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Randall C. Till, the Inspector in Charge of the New York Division of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS), announced today that Anand Sekaran, the president and director of Wasson Capital Ltd. (Wasson), an investment fund, surrendered and pled guilty today in Manhattan federal court to engaging in a $2.3 million fraudulent scheme to defraud Wasson’s investors. Sekaran misled Wasson investors concerning the fund’s value, distributed funds to investors that were contributed from other investors, and issued fraudulent account and fund performance statements. He pled guilty today before U.S. District Judge Robert P. Patterson.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara stated, “We’ve seen far too many of the classic Ponzi schemes perpetrated by the likes of Anand Sekaran that cheat and rob investors. Like so many defendants before him, Sekaran’s shell game with other people’s money finally caught up with him, and he will now face justice.”

New York USPIS Inspector in Charge Randall C. Till said, “Postal inspectors will aggressively investigate and bring to justice anyone who uses the U.S. mail to fraudulently enrich themselves at the expense of investors. Today’s guilty plea by Mr. Sekaran is another example of greed overcoming honest business practices.”

According to the information and statements made during the guilty plea proceeding:

In 1997, Sekaran formed Wasson as an asset management firm in New York, New York, that would invest client money primarily in the U.S. options market, and he solicited investors from 1999 through 2010. As a result of both the substantial losses Wasson incurred and several redemption requests, Sekaran engaged in a scheme to defraud investors, divert investor funds, and perpetrate a Ponzi scheme through two methods from 2009 through June 2011.

First, Sekaran misrepresented to existing and potential investors Wasson’s investment value and past performance, the ways investor funds were being used, and the source of funds distributed to investors who had requested redemptions. Specifically, Sekaran misrepresented that Wasson was stable and doing well so that he could secure additional contributions. In response to certain investor redemption requests, Sekaran also used money from other investors to pay off the redeeming investors.

Second, Sekaran distributed fraudulent statements to investors in order to forestall redemption requests, induce new investors to contribute to Wasson, and induce existing investors to provide additional contributions. For example, Sekaran caused misleading and fabricated account statements to be sent to several Wasson investors that falsely inflated the value of their investments. He also created and distributed fraudulent performance statements purporting to show that the Wasson fund was performing well, when, in fact, it was suffering losses.

In the course of his scheme, Sekaran misappropriated approximately $500,000 of investor funds. As a result of his conduct, more than 10 investors lost a total of approximately $2 million.

Sekaran, 44, of Miami, Florida, pled guilty to one count of securities fraud and one count of mail fraud. The securities fraud and mail fraud charge each carry a maximum term of 20 years in prison. Sekaran also faces a maximum fine of $5 million. As part of his plea agreement, Sekaran agreed to pay $2.3 million in restitution and forfeit for the proceeds obtained as a result of the offense. He is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Patterson on February 19, 2013.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...