Skip to main content

A Shift in Approach: Examining the Trump Administration's Stance on Diversity Initiatives and Disparate Impact


By: Joel Irving 

The landscape of federal policy surrounding diversity and discrimination underwent a notable transformation during the Trump administration. A series of executive actions signaled a clear intent to move away from established diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and to significantly curtail the application of a legal concept known as "disparate impact." This represented a distinct pivot, emphasizing what the administration termed a "merit-based" system for federal employment and operations.

At the forefront of these changes was a significant executive order, "Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy." This directive didn't mince words: its stated goal was to eliminate the use of disparate impact liability "in all contexts to the maximum degree possible." For federal agencies, this translated into a mandate to deprioritize the enforcement of disparate impact claims. They were also instructed to review existing cases and investigations and to revise any regulations that leaned on this legal theory.

So, what is disparate impact? In essence, it's a legal doctrine acknowledging that certain practices, even if not intentionally discriminatory, can still result in disproportionately negative outcomes for groups protected under civil rights laws. Think of a hiring test that, while neutral on its face, statistically screens out a much higher percentage of applicants from a particular racial minority. Disparate impact theory allows for such practices to be challenged as potentially unlawful.

Beyond targeting disparate impact, the Trump administration also took aim at a broader range of DEI initiatives. Executive orders were issued to dismantle and defund various programs across federal agencies and for federal contractors. This led to tangible changes: DEI offices were closed, programs were discontinued, and even DEI-related language was scrubbed from government documents and websites. The overarching message was a call to cease activities perceived by the administration as promoting "divisive concepts."

These policy shifts marked a significant departure from the approaches of previous administrations, which had generally sought to expand or solidify federal civil rights enforcement and diversity promotion efforts. The Trump administration's actions were framed as a way to ensure fairness and equal opportunity by focusing strictly on individual merit, rather than group identity or outcomes.

However, it's crucial to understand the scope and limitations of these executive actions. While the executive orders clearly aimed to stop federal agencies from using and enforcing disparate impact theory, they couldn't single-handedly erase the underlying legal framework. Disparate impact as a legal concept is embedded in laws like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and has been repeatedly interpreted and upheld by the courts. Legal experts have consistently pointed out that executive orders alone cannot eliminate this legal recourse, and private individuals or groups could, in theory, still pursue disparate impact claims through the judicial system.

Nevertheless, the administration's policies undeniably created a new operational reality for federal agencies, compelling them to re-evaluate and often retract their diversity initiatives and their approach to discrimination claims. This period represented a distinct chapter in the ongoing conversation about equality, discrimination, and the role of the federal government in addressing these complex issues. The long-term effects of these changes, and how subsequent administrations may build upon or diverge from them, continue to be a subject of observation and debate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

Mortgage Fraud

Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau announced today the indictment of 13 individuals and a mortgage origination company for perpetrating over $100 million in mortgage fraud over a four-year period in the New York City metropolitan area. In addition, 12 individuals have already waived indictment and pleaded guilty to felonies relating to their participation in the mortgage fraud scheme. The indictment charges 13 individuals and the mortgage company, AFG FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., with enterprise corruption, grand larceny, scheme to defraud and conspiracy involving 19 fraudulent mortgage transactions. The defendants include the principals and a number of employees of the mortgage company, as well as bank employees, appraisers, and three attorneys. Two other attorneys are among the defendants who already pleaded guilty. The crimes charged in the indictment occurred between June 2004 and April 2009 with the bulk of the fraudulent closings occurring from mid-2005 through the end of...

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF SIX SUBCONTRACTING COMPANIES AND THEIR OWNERS IN MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR FRAUD

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictments of six subcontracting companies and their owners for colluding with LEHR CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (LEHR) in a multimillion dollar scheme that defrauded numerous construction clients over the past decade. See, related story. The announcement comes one day after DA Vance announced LEHR and four executives were indicted on crimes including Enterprise Corruption, the New York State Racketeering law. GODSELL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and its owner ARTHUR GODSELL are charged with Grand Larceny in the Second Degree. JT ROSELLE LIGHTING, INC. and its owner JAMES ROSELLE, LIBERTY CONTRACTING CORPORATION and its owners GEORGE FOTIADIS and KEVIN FOTIADIS, PJ MECHANICAL and its owner JAMES PAPPAS, SUPERIOR ACOUSTICS, INC. and its owner KENNETH MCGUIGAN, and SWEENEY & HARKIN CARPENTRY and its owner MICHAEL HAYES are charged with Grand Larceny in the Third Degree.[1] "The defendants in this case cheated clie...