Skip to main content

Know Your Rights: How Federal Law Protects Against Sexual Harassment


The recent case involving East Jordan Plastics and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is a powerful reminder of a fundamental right for all employees: the right to a workplace free from sexual harassment. The company's settlement of $460,000 and other required actions highlights a key piece of legislation, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 

What is Title VII?
Title VII is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This includes protection from sexual harassment, which is a form of sex discrimination. The law makes it illegal for an employer to allow a "hostile work environment" to exist, which is a workplace where offensive, severe, or frequent harassing conduct makes it difficult for an employee to do their job.

In the case of East Jordan Plastics, the EEOC's lawsuit alleged that a male co-worker sexually harassed a class of female employees at the company's Beaverton, Michigan location. This harassment included offensive sexual comments and inappropriate touching.

Despite receiving at least two complaints from different women, the company took no disciplinary action against the harasser. The lawsuit alleged that the harassment continued until a third female employee complained, at which point the company finally investigated and fired the male employee.

The Role of the EEOC
The EEOC is the federal agency responsible for enforcing Title VII and other anti-discrimination laws. When a company is accused of violating these laws, the EEOC can file a lawsuit on behalf of the affected employees, as it did in the East Jordan Plastics case.

Often, these lawsuits are resolved through a consent decree. A consent decree is a legally binding agreement between the company and the EEOC that settles the dispute without the company admitting guilt. In the East Jordan Plastics settlement, the company agreed to pay a monetary settlement and also to take specific actions to prevent future harassment.

This is where another key term, injunctive and affirmative relief, comes in. This type of relief requires a company to take specific actions to remedy the issue. In this case, East Jordan Plastics has to provide anti-harassment training to its employees, report to the EEOC on how it handles future complaints, and post a notice about the settlement and employees' rights. This ensures the company doesn't just pay a fine but also implements changes to prevent future harm.

Key Takeaway 
The East Jordan Plastics case shows that employers have a responsibility to address sexual harassment in the workplace. When they fail to take action after being made aware of harassment, they can be held accountable by the EEOC. If you ever experience or witness sexual harassment at work, remember that you have rights, and there are federal agencies like the EEOC to help you enforce them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF SIX SUBCONTRACTING COMPANIES AND THEIR OWNERS IN MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR FRAUD

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictments of six subcontracting companies and their owners for colluding with LEHR CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (LEHR) in a multimillion dollar scheme that defrauded numerous construction clients over the past decade. See, related story. The announcement comes one day after DA Vance announced LEHR and four executives were indicted on crimes including Enterprise Corruption, the New York State Racketeering law. GODSELL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and its owner ARTHUR GODSELL are charged with Grand Larceny in the Second Degree. JT ROSELLE LIGHTING, INC. and its owner JAMES ROSELLE, LIBERTY CONTRACTING CORPORATION and its owners GEORGE FOTIADIS and KEVIN FOTIADIS, PJ MECHANICAL and its owner JAMES PAPPAS, SUPERIOR ACOUSTICS, INC. and its owner KENNETH MCGUIGAN, and SWEENEY & HARKIN CARPENTRY and its owner MICHAEL HAYES are charged with Grand Larceny in the Third Degree.[1] "The defendants in this case cheated clie...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...