Skip to main content

David J. Hernandez Indicted for Allegedly Swindling 290 Investors in $12 Million Ponzi Scheme

A Downers Grove man who purported to offer financial investment services to the public was indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly engaging in a two-year Ponzi scheme that resulted in losses totaling approximately $3.5 million when it collapsed last month. The indictment alleges that David J. Hernandez fraudulently induced some 290 victims to invest approximately $12 million through his business, NextStep Financial Services, Inc., and several related companies. Hernandez was charged with four counts of mail fraud in an indictment that was returned late yesterday and announced today by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and Robert D. Grant, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Hernandez, 48, of Downers Grove, was initially charged with a single count of mail fraud in a criminal complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Chicago on June 17, several days after FBI agents executed a search warrant at NextStep's offices on the 22nd floor at 225 West Washington St. After Hernandez was located on June 22 by police in Normal, Ill., he appeared in Federal Court in Peoria on June 29 and was ordered transferred in custody to Chicago. He is expected to arrive in Chicago next week, at which time his first court appearance here will be scheduled.

In addition to the mail fraud counts, the indictment seeks forfeiture of approximately $3.5 million and two luxury automobiles: a 2009 Audi and a 2007 Mercedes Benz ML350.

According to the indictment, between July 2007 and June 12, 2009, Hernandez defrauded prospective investors and investors in a NextStep Financial Services product described as a "Guaranteed Investment Contract." He made false representations and promises regarding the risk of investing with NextStep, the manner in which the victims' funds would be used, the returns that NextStep generated, and his background, it alleges.

Hernandez allegedly falsely promised investors monthly returns of 10 to 16 percent, with no risk of loss to their principal, through investing their funds in Check 'n Go stores, which offered short-term "payday advance" loans, and which Hernandez claimed were owned or financed by NextStep. In fact, as Hernandez allegedly knew, no NextStep investor funds were used to purchase or finance the operation of Check 'n Go stores.

Hernandez also fraudulently represented to investors that their principal was protected through insurance that NextStep obtained from various insurance companies, the indictment alleges, when he knew, in fact, that victims' investments were not insured in any manner. And, knowing that victims' funds were not earning any interest whatsoever, Hernandez allegedly converted the investors' funds to his own benefit and used their money to make Ponzi-style "interest" payments to other NextStep investors.

The indictment also alleges that Hernandez lied to investors about his background and experience, including falsely representing that he had a law degree and a master's degree in business administration, and that he had 26 years of experience in the financial industry, while failing to disclose pertinent material information about his personal background.

Mr. Fitzgerald and Mr. Grant commended the assistance of the Downers Grove and Normal police departments and the FBI office in Peoria.

If convicted, each count of mail fraud carries maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, or the Court may impose an alternative maximum fine totaling twice the loss or twice the gain, whichever is greater. The Court, however, would determine the appropriate sentence to be imposed under the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...