New York Paralegal Blog

Posts

A Look Back: The FalconStor Bribery Scandal and the Cost of Corporate Crime

The 2012 enforcement action against FalconStor Software, Inc. stands as a stark reminder that corporate ambition, when unchecked by ethics, can lead to severe legal and financial disaster. This case wasn't about a simple sales oversight; it was an egregious, calculated scheme of commercial bribery coupled with a deep-seated effort to deceive the public and regulators. A decade later, let's revisit this scandal involving the Long Island-based company, the core laws it violated, and the lasting consequences of trying to purchase contracts instead of earning them. The Crime: Buying Loyalty with Stock and Gambling Money Between 2007 and 2010, FalconStor, eager to secure licensing contracts worth over $12 million with J.P. Morgan Chase, engaged in a systematic bribery operation. This involved giving J.P. Morgan Chase executives over $300,000 in value, including: Restricted Stock and Options: Fraudulently granted to relatives of the executives. Cash Equivalents: Large dep...

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

A Look Back: DOJ Paralegal Sentenced in 2023 for Undermining Justice

The case of former Department of Justice (DOJ) paralegal Tawanna Hilliard, who was sentenced to 33 months in prison, provides a stark lesson on the severity of crimes aimed at undermining the judicial system. Convicted of Witness Retaliation and Obstruction of Justice for exposing cooperating witnesses online, her actions struck at the heart of law enforcement's ability to protect sources and pursue justice. Following a one-week trial, Hilliard was convicted in 2023. She was sentenced on Tuesday, March 14, 2023. Here is an explanation of the laws surrounding this matter and the severe consequences associated with the crimes. 1. The Laws and What They Mean The charges brought against Hilliard—and her subsequent conviction—are among the most serious crimes against the administration of justice. Witness Retaliation The Law: Federal law prohibits harming a person, or attempting to harm them, with the intent to retaliate against that person for providing truthful information...

The Two "Victimhoods": A Ben Shapiro Paradox

Ben Shapiro, a prominent conservative commentator, has built a significant platform on principles like individual responsibility, meritocracy, and a skepticism towards "victimhood culture." Yet, a closer look at his commentary reveals a fascinating paradox when comparing his views on two distinct group narratives: that of Black Americans discussing systemic racism and the legacy of slavery, and that of Jewish people discussing the Holocaust and antisemitism. At first glance, Shapiro's stance seems consistent: he generally rails against narratives that emphasize historical oppression as a primary driver of present-day disadvantage. However, a deeper dive into how he applies this principle to these two specific groups reveals a notable philosophical inconsistency. The "Victim Mentality" He Rejects: Black Americans and Systemic Racism Shapiro frequently argues against the idea that systemic racism and the legacy of slavery are the primary explanations f...

Understanding "Spoofing" and Why Banks Get Off the Hook (Sometimes)

Have you ever wondered what goes on behind the scenes when financial institutions face legal trouble? A recent case involving BofA Securities (BoAS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) offers a great look into a specific type of market manipulation called "spoofing" and how corporate accountability works in the U.S. What is "Spoofing"? Imagine you're at an auction, and someone keeps shouting fake bids just to trick others into thinking there's more interest in an item than there actually is. That's essentially what "spoofing" is in financial markets. In the BoAS case, two former traders were found to be engaged in spoofing in the U.S. Treasuries market. This means they: Placed a large order to buy or sell (the "spoof" order). Without any intention of actually executing that order. The goal was to create a false impression of supply or demand. Once other traders reacted to this fake activity, the spoofing trader would quick...

Why Systemic Racism Isn't Just "Hating People": A Simple Explanation

Systemic racism isn't about one bad person or even a few bad laws. It’s a self-operating system that keeps racial inequality in place by controlling money, land, and power. It ensures that even when Black communities succeed, the rules of the game are rigged to make that success temporary. Here’s how it works, using three key historical moves: 1. The Block: Taking the First Step Back Systemic racism starts by blocking wealth creation at the source. It’s a broken promise made by the government itself. The Land Betrayal: After slavery, the government promised formerly enslaved people “Forty Acres and a Mule.” This land ownership was the essential first step toward wealth and independence. However, President Andrew Johnson quickly revoked that promise and returned the land to the white former slave owners. The Result: By denying this initial wealth transfer, the system immediately forced millions of Black families into sharecropping—a form of economic servitude—rather tha...

When a Paralegal Betrays Trust: Inside the Compelling Case of USA v. Whitaker

The federal indictment of former paralegal Crystal Whitaker in Kentucky has ripped the curtain back on a staggering alleged scheme involving wire fraud, tax evasion, and aggravated identity theft. This case is not just about financial crime; it is a profound story of professional betrayal and exploitation. While Ms. Whitaker is currently presumed innocent, the details of the indictment serve as a powerful warning about the consequences of violating trust in the legal profession. Let's dissect the gravity of these accusations and the severe legal reality Ms. Whitaker now faces. The Betrayal: Exploiting Tragedy for Profit The core of the USA v. Whitaker case is an alleged exploitation that began with a tragedy—the death of Whitaker's supervising attorney, J.R.S. As a paralegal, Whitaker held a position of access and trust, which she is accused of systematically dismantling: 1. Concealment: She allegedly concealed the attorney’s death to prevent oversight and maintain...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...

A Tale of Two Civil Rights: How One Administration Amplified Protections for Some While Eroding Them for Others—A Violation of the 14th Amendment's Promise

The promise of equal protection under the law is a cornerstone of American democracy, enshrined in the powerful yet simple language of the 14th Amendment: "No State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." However, a close examination of the Trump administration's policies reveals a deeply contradictory approach to civil rights that, critics argue, undermines the very spirit and intent of the 14th Amendment. By selectively strengthening protections against discrimination for one group while simultaneously weakening the core tools used to combat systemic injustice for another, the administration created a profound dissonance in our national commitment to equality. The Constitutional Contradiction The heart of the contradiction lies in how the administration sought to define and enforce "equal protection": 1. Bolstering Antisemitism Protections: A Formalized Front President Trump used Executive Orders to bo...