Skip to main content

AG CUOMO ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT WITH WACHOVIA TO RECOVER BILLIONS FOR INVESTORS IN AUCTION RATE SECURITIES

NEW YORK, NY (August 15, 2008) - Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo today announced another agreement to provide liquidity to consumers who purchased auction rate securities. Under the latest agreement, Wachovia Securities, LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC (collectively, “Wachovia”) will return over $8.5 billion to investors across New York State and the nation. The agreement settles allegations that Wachovia made misrepresentations in its marketing and sales of auction rate securities. Wachovia marketed and sold auction rate securities as safe, cash-equivalent products, when in fact they faced increasing liquidity risk.

Within the past eight days, Cuomo has signed agreements restoring nearly $35 billion of liquidity to thousands of investors nationwide.

Under Cuomo’s settlement, Wachovia has agreed to buy back, no later than November 28, 2008, all illiquid auction rate securities from all Wachovia retail customers, charities, and small businesses. Wachovia will also pay damages to investors who sold securities for a loss. Wachovia will also pay New York State and the North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”) civil penalties in the amount of $50 million, which will be distributed pro rata by states’ investment dollar totals.

“At the heart of this investigation is the simple goal of returning billions of dollars back into the hands of investors, which in turn injects confidence into the entire market,” said Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. “The industry is now taking responsibility for correcting a problem they helped create, and we’ll continue working to make all investors whole.”

Today’s agreement comes a day after agreements with JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley and one week after Cuomo settled similar allegations against Citigroup and UBS. The five settlements together provide relief to thousands of investors who were left holding nearly $35 billion worth of securities they could not sell after the widespread failure of the auction rate securities market this past February:

Institution Approximate Number of Accounts Approximate Amount of Buyback (in billions)
Citigroup 38,000 $ 7.3
UBS 40,000 $ 11.5
Morgan Stanley 19,500 $ 4.5
JP Morgan Chase 6,000 $ 3.0
Wachovia 43,000 $8.5
Totals: 146,500 $34.8

From the beginning of his investigation into the auction rate market, the Attorney General’s objective has been to bring relief to investors stuck with illiquid auction rate securities. Citigroup, UBS, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and Wachovia are five of the larger participants in the auction rate securities market, and among them are responsible for more than half of all auction rate securities owned by investors. The settlements with Citigroup, UBS, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and Wachovia accomplish precisely the kind of relief investors have demanded, and deserve. The investigation continues as to other market participants.

Under the settlement, Wachovia will also:

• Fully reimburse all retail investors who sold their auction rate securities at a discount after the market failed;
• Consent to a special, public arbitration procedure to resolve claims of consequential damages suffered by retail investors as a result of not being able to access their funds;
• Undertake to expeditiously provide liquidity solutions to all other institutional investors;
• Reimburse all refinancing fees to any New York State municipal issuers who issued auction rate securities through Wachovia since August 1, 2007.

The Attorney General thanked NASAA and its multi-state ARS Task Force, who joined the Attorney General in announcing the agreements, for their efforts in achieving today’s settlements. He also thanked specifically Missouri, which was the lead state in today’s investigations, and noted the personal involvement of Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan. In addition, the Attorney General thanked the enforcement staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission for their cooperation in their auction rate securities investigations.

Assistant Attorneys General Vicki Andreadis, Peter Dean, Pamela Mahon, Armen Morian, Christopher Mulvihill, Alisha Smith and Ethan Zlotchew, conducted the Wachovia investigation along with Kitty Kay Chan, Economist for the Division of Economic Justice, all under the supervision of David A. Markowitz, Chief of the Investor Protection Bureau, and Eric Corngold, Executive Deputy Attorney General for Economic Justice.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...