Skip to main content

ROBERT HALF LEGAL GOLD-LEVEL SPONSOR OF ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL 2008 ANNUAL MEETING

MENLO PARK, CA -- Robert Half Legal, a leading provider of highly skilled attorneys, paralegals and legal support personnel on a project and full-time basis, today announced it will exhibit as a gold-level sponsor at the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) 2008 Annual Meeting. More than 2000 attendees, speakers, and exhibitors are expected at the conference to be held at the Washington State Convention and Trade Center in Seattle, Washington, October 19-22, 2008. Details about the conference can be found at http://am.acc.com.

On Tuesday, October 21, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., Robert Half Legal, ACC's exclusive staffing partner, will conduct a Continuing Legal Education seminar entitled, “Good to Excellent: Managing and Maintaining a Successful Law Department.” Panelists scheduled to appear are John Morrow, senior vice president and general counsel of Vertafore; Jeffry Shelby, vice president and general counsel, Varolli Corporation; and Charles Volkert, executive director, Robert Half Legal. Due to popular demand, the session also will be available via live webcast. Instructions for listening to the webcast will be posted prior to the session at http://am.acc.com/web_casts.cfm. More...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...