Skip to main content

Multi-Agency “Operation Mansion Hill” Nets Guns, Drugs, and Cash

Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo today announced the indictment of five Albany County residents for taking part in a highly organized heroin and cocaine distribution operation centered in the Capital District.

As a result of the investigation, dubbed “Operation Mansion Hill,” nearly 100 grams of cocaine with a street value of approximately $9,000 along with three semiautomatic pistols and $12,000 cash were seized. In the Indictment, filed with the Albany County Supreme Court, a Grand Jury charged five people with possession and/or sale of narcotics and conspiracy to distribute narcotics. Additionally, one defendant was charged with multiple weapons possession offenses.

The indictment was the result of a four month multi-agency investigation led by Attorney General Cuomo’s Organized Crime Task Force and the Albany Police Department. Also participating in the investigation were the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Safe Streets Task Force, the United States Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Albany County Sheriff’s Department.

“This operation is yet another strike at the heart of the illicit drug trade in the Capital Region," said Attorney General Cuomo. "We have succeeded in getting more drugs and handguns off the streets and will continue to work with our partners in local law enforcement to crush distribution networks that threaten the livelihood of our communities. My Office remains dedicated to eradicating the drug trade across the Capital Region.”

According to the indictment, Steven Fletcher, 29, and Ebony Jones, 32, both of Ravena, were the leaders of a drug distribution ring which obtained narcotics from both local and New York City suppliers. Antonio Heard, 28, of Albany, is accused of being the operation’s principal local source of cocaine. Once the organization obtained the drugs they would be cut, weighed, packaged and sold throughout the Capital Region by Lance Fletcher, 25, and Linda Ross, 26, both of Albany. When dealing with cocaine, it was often purchased in powder form and then “cooked” by the conspirators into crack-cocaine for distribution.

The Grand Jury charged Steven Fletcher, Lance Fletcher, Ebony Jones, Linda Ross and Antonio Heard with Possession and/or Sale of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree (class B felony), punishable by up to 9 years in prison, and Conspiracy in the Fourth Degree (class E felony), which carries a maximum of 4 years in prison. The Grand Jury also indicted Antonio Heard for Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance in the Second Degree (class A-II felony), with a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and Lance Fletcher for multiple counts of Criminal Possession of a Weapon, some of which carry a maximum sentence of 7 years in prison. Additionally, all defendants except Heard were charged with Criminally Using Drug Paraphernalia in the Second Degree, a misdemeanor.

Those indicted and their alleged roles:

Antonio Heard, 28, of 121 S. Allen Street, Albany, New York, - one of the organization’s principal suppliers of cocaine.

Steven Fletcher, 29, of 28 Oakbrook Manor, Ravena, New York - in charge of the organization.

Ebony Jones, 32, of 28 Oakbrook Manor, Ravena, New York - also in charge of the organization.

Lance Fletcher, 25, 217 Clinton Avenue, Albany, New York - worker who stored, processed and sold heroin and cocaine.

Linda Ross, 26, 118 2nd Street, Albany, New York - worker who stored, processed and sold cocaine.

Seized during the investigation were:

More than 90 grams of cocaine with a street value of approximately $9,000.00

Five digital scales used to weigh narcotics

Drug packaging materials

A Lorcin .380 caliber semiautomatic pistol

A Kel-Tec .380 caliber semiautomatic pistol

A Colt .45 caliber semiautomatic pistol

Numerous rounds of ammunition

Approximately $12,000

Since its inception in 2007, the Attorney General’s Upstate Guns, Gangs, and Drugs Initiative has conducted a variety of operations in cooperation with local and federal authorities resulting in charges against more than 300 defendants and seized well over $3 million in drugs and cash, as well as dozens of guns.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...