Skip to main content

NYS Employees Illegally Collected Unemployment Benefits While on the State’s Payroll

Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo today announced the arrests of 30 former and current New York State employees who allegedly obtained unemployment benefits illegally while on State payroll. The individuals were arrested as part of the Attorney General’s statewide sweep over the past week, targeting abuses of the financially strapped New York State unemployment system. In New York’s current fiscal crisis, the unemployment insurance fund provides much-needed financial relief to thousands of New Yorkers who have lost their jobs.

According to complaints filed in New York, Bronx, Kings, Queens, Richmond, Suffolk, Nassau, Albany, Dutchess, Rockland and Westchester Counties over the past week, these 30 defendants stole thousands of dollars from New York State by falsely certifying that they were qualified for unemployment insurance benefits through the Department of Labor’s electronic certification process.

“New York’s unemployment insurance fund was created to help hard-working individuals who find themselves out of a job get back on their feet,” said Attorney General Cuomo. “In this economic climate, the fund is more important than ever, and we cannot allow it to be depleted through fraud, waste and abuse. Individuals who attempt to undermine the safety net we provide for New Yorkers will be held accountable.”

In order to qualify for unemployment insurance benefits in New York, an individual must truthfully certify by phone or Internet, on a weekly basis, that he or she has not worked more than four days that week or earned more than $405 that week. The New York State Department of Labor has a system in place to routinely cross-check State employees against individuals receiving unemployment benefits. According to the Attorney General’s Office, the 30 defendants all lied to the Department of Labor and falsely certified that they were eligible for benefits. Several of the defendants are accused of falsely certifying their ineligibility to work for 15 or more consecutive weeks, stealing thousands of dollars from New York’s unemployment insurance fund.

The following individuals from across the State were arrested by the Attorney General’s Office over the past week:

* Maureen McGovern, 70, of Greenwich Street, New York, NY
* Randy Destin, 45, of Pacific Street, Brooklyn, NY
* Kimberly Abrams, 42, of Watson Avenue, Bronx, NY
* Ronald Antoine, 52, of Cruger Avenue, Bronx, NY
* William Gee, 45, of 151st Street, Bronx, NY
* Ani Leon-Marquez, 42, of 169th Street, Bronx, NY
* Gail Miller, 32, of Elsmere Place, Bronx, NY
* Phillip Lee, 24, of Channingway Court East, Columbus, OH
* Nestloye Elliot, 50, of Bascolm Ave, Jamaica, NY
* Martha Ulloa, 34, of 88th Street, Woodhaven, NY
* Gaylord Beltran, 27, of Forest Avenue, Staten Island, NY
* Aliesohn Reid, 27, of Caton Avenue, Brooklyn, NY
* Renee Bridgeman, 36, of Myrtle Avenue, Brooklyn, NY
* Kira S. Young, 27, of Albany, NY
* Jamie Viola, 31, of Latham, NY
* Jean Davis, 53, of Albany, NY
* Greg Askilden, 53, of Palenville, NY
* Tracy Barber, 26, of Rome, NY
* Wayne Earing, 36, of Rensselaer, NY
* Deborah Girgenti, 55, of Rensselaer, NY
* Charles McMillan, 53, of Hartwick, NY
* Cesar Ferarras, Jr., 35, of Poughkeepsie, NY
* Joel Babcock, 33, of Stony Point, NY
* Dawn Chase, 49, of Peekskill, NY
* Steve Lawrence, 46, of Mount Vernon, NY
* Carmen Alvarez, 38, of Islandia, NY
* Aida Licata, 48, of Center Moriches, NY
* Donna Ryall, 51, of Deer Park, NY
* Jimmy Rodriguez, 48, of Williston Park, NY

The various charges brought against the 30 individuals across the State include Grand Larceny in the Third and Fourth Degrees (D and E felonies), Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree (E Felony) and Petit Larceny (A misdemeanor). Defendants charged with D felonies may be sentenced to up to seven years in prison while those charged with E felonies face up to four years incarceration.

The charges against the defendants are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.

The Attorney General thanked the New York State Department of Labor for their help during the initial investigation.

The case was handled by Assistant Attorney General Jessica E. Silver of the Attorney Generals Public Integrity Bureau, under the supervision of Deputy Bureau Chief Monica Stamm of the Public Integrity Bureau, Deputy Bureau Chief Richard Ernst of the Criminal Prosecutions Bureau, Special Deputy Attorney General for Public Integrity Ellen Biben, and Executive Deputy Attorney General Robin Baker. The investigation was handled by Investigator Mike Ward under the supervision of Deputy Chief Investigator Thomas Richardson, and Internal Security Specialist Michelle Martone with the New York State Department of Labor.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...