Skip to main content

CHARLESTON TEMP FIRM AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY SUED BY EEOC FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT

ORANGEBURG, S.C. – Alternative Staffing, Inc., a Charleston, S.C.-based temporary employment staffing firm, and Clancy & Theys, a construction company headquartered in Raleigh, N.C., violated federal law by subjecting a class of female employees to a sexually hostile work environment, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit announced today. The EEOC’s further charged that Alternative Staffing forced three female employees out of their jobs because of their sex. Finally, the EEOC said, Clancy & Theys interfered with the equal employment opportunities of its female employees.

According to the EEOC’s suit, from June 2006 through at least July 12, 2006, Shequann Singleton, Tasha Collier, Tomeka Sanders and other similarly situated female employees were subjected to sexual harassment. Singleton, Collier and Sanders were employed by Alternative Staffing and assigned to work at Clancy & Theys’ work site in Orangeburg, S.C. The sexual harassment included inappropriate sexual comments, requests for sex, and unwelcome touching of the women’s breasts and buttocks. The women were allegedly harassed by a labor foreman of Clancy & Theys who supervised Singleton, Collier and Sanders, and by employees of a third-party contrac­tor performing work at Clancy & Theys’ work site. The women complained about the sexual harassment to Alternative Staffing’s office manager and asked to be transferred to another work site because of the harassment, but their request was denied. The women also complained to Clancy & Theys’ foreman.

Despite the women’s complaints, the EEOC said, the harassment continued. In addition, after the women complained, a manager of Clancy & Theys said he did not want the women to return to work for Clancy & Theys. As a result of the harassment, the women were forced to resign.

Sexual harassment violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC filed suit (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Alternative Staffing, Inc. and Clancy & Theys Construction Co., Civ. No. 5:09-cv-2067-MBS-JRM) in U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina after first attempting to reach a voluntary settlement.

The EEOC seeks an injunction to stop Alternative Staffing, Inc. and Clancy & Theys Construction Co. from engaging in any employment practice which discriminates on the basis of sex. The suit also seeks monetary damages for Shequann Singleton, Tasha Collier, Tomeka Sanders and other similarly situated female employees.

Lynette A. Barnes, regional attorney of the EEOC’s Charlotte District Office, said, “This case is a reminder to employers that they must provide a harassment-free environment for their employees, regardless of who the perpetrators of the harassment are. Third parties can create a sexually hostile work environment for a company’s employees, and that is just as illegal.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...