Skip to main content

Oklahoma man pleads guilty to enticing minor for sex When he was arrested, he possessed a pistol, duct tape and handcuffs in his car

SPRINGFIELD, Mo. - An Oklahoma man, who traveled to Missouri and tried to entice a 13-year-old girl to have sex with him, pleaded guilty in federal court Wednesday. This guilty plea resulted from an investigation conducted by the following agencies: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Jasper County, Mo., Sheriff's Department, the Oklahoma Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, and the police departments of Tulsa and Stillwater, Okla.

Robert Dean Graef, 29, of Tulsa, pleaded guilty Oct. 21 before U.S. District Judge Richard E. Dorr, Western District of Missouri, to attempting to entice a person he believed was a 13-year-old girl to engage in illicit sex, and to traveling across state lines to engage in sex with a minor.

Graef engaged in online chats with a person he believed was a 13-year-old girl, but who in fact was an undercover officer with the Jasper County Sheriff's Department. Graef arranged to meet the girl at a crypt in a Carthage, Mo., cemetery on the evening of April 17, 2009. He was arrested when he entered the cemetery and drove to the crypt. At the time of his arrest, Graef had a pistol holster and a .40-caliber magazine in his pocket. In the center console of his car, arresting officers discovered a loaded .40-caliber Glock pistol with a laser sight and another ammunition magazine. Officers also found the following items in Graef's vehicle: duct tape, black plastic zip ties fashioned into handcuffs, handcuffs, two Glock .40-caliber magazines each loaded with 13 rounds of ammunition, and 50 rounds of .45-caliber ammunition.

Graef admitted that he used the Internet to attempt to entice a minor to engage in illicit sexual activity from April 13 to April 17, 2009. Graef also admitted that he traveled across state lines to Jasper County, Mo., on April 17 to attempt to engage in illicit sexual conduct.

By pleading guilty, Graef also agreed to forfeit to the government the Glock .40-caliber handgun, the magazines and .40-caliber ammunition, and a 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible, all of which were used to commit the offense.

Under federal statutes, Graef is subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years in federal prison without parole, and a maximum sentence of life in federal prison without parole, plus a fine up to $500,000.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Randall D. Eggert, Western District of Missouri, is prosecuting this case.

"This case reveals the disturbing truth that some adults will go to great lengths to sexually exploit minors," said Gilbert Trill, assistant special agent-in-charge of the ICE Office of Investigations in Kansas City. "All children have an absolute right to grow up free from the fear of sexual exploitation. Identifying and investigating those who victimize children is one of ICE's most important responsibilities."

The ICE investigation and arrest was part of an initiative known as Operation Predator. Operation Predator protects children from sexual predators, including those who travel across continents to have sex with minors, Internet child pornographers, criminal alien sex offenders and child traffickers. Since the initiative was launched in July 2003, there have been almost 12,000 individuals arrested nationwide.

ICE encourages the public to report suspected child predators and any suspicious activity through its toll-free hotline at 1-866-347-2423. This hotline is staffed around the clock by investigators.

Suspected child sexual exploitation or missing children may be reported to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, an Operation Predator partner, at 1-800-843-5678 or http://www.cybertipline.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...