Skip to main content

STOCK-LOAN FINDER INDICTED FOR KICKBACKS AND FRAUD

Charges Include Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud and Wire Fraud

An indictment was unsealed this morning in federal court in Brooklyn alleging securities fraud conspiracy and related charges against Ronald Garcia, a purported stock-loan finder who did business as Independent Investor Services, Inc. (“Independent Investor”)1 . The defendant’s initial appearance and arraignment is scheduled for this afternoon before United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go, at the U.S. Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. The case has been assigned to United States District Judge John Gleeson.

The indictment was announced by Benton J. Campbell, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Joseph M. Demarest, Jr., Assistant Director-in-Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office.

The charges arise out of an ongoing industry-wide investigation into allegations of bribery and kickbacks in the securities-lending industry, also called the stock-loan industry. Securities firms often borrow and loan securities among themselves for a number of reasons, including facilitating short-sale transactions. Stock-loan finders can assist these firms by locating inventories of a given security and matching borrowers and lenders in stock-loan transactions. The investigation disclosed that stock-loan traders at several brokerage firms funneled millions of dollars in fraudulent finder’s fees to their co-conspirators, often where no finder’s services had been rendered, in exchange for cash bribes and, in some instances, payments to the traders’ relatives. To date, 30 individuals have been convicted in this district of federal kickback and bribery schemes in the stock-loan industry, including former securities-lending traders at A.G. Edwards and Sons, Inc.; Janney Montgomery Scott LLC; JP Morgan Chase; Kellner Dileo & Company, Inc.; Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.; Morgan Stanley; National Investors Services, also known as TD Waterhouse; Nomura Securities International, Inc.; Pax Clearing Corporation; PFPC Worldwide Inc.; Schonfeld Securities, LLC; and Van der Moolen Specialists USA, LLC.

The six-count indictment announced today charges Garcia with conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud, securities fraud, and wire fraud. As alleged in the indictment, Independent Investor received finder’s fees in connection with stock-loan transactions between Schonfeld Securities, LLC, and Van der Moolen Specialists USA, LLC, when neither Garcia nor Independent Investor had performed any legitimate finder services. In exchange for these fraudulently-obtained finder’s fees, Garcia paid cash kickbacks to a trader at Van der Moolen Specialists USA, LLC , who in turn paid a portion of the kickbacks to a trader at Schonfeld Securities, LLC.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission previously filed a related civil suit against Garcia in federal court in the Eastern District of New York.

“The defendant allegedly entered into a fraudulent arrangement and paid kickbacks to corrupt traders at brokerage firms to buy their business,” stated United States Attorney Campbell. “Such conduct undermines the public’s confidence in the nation’s securities markets and will be vigorously investigated and prosecuted.” Mr. Campbell thanked the Securities and Exchange Commission for its assistance.

FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge Demarest stated, “Legitimate stock loan finder’s fees
are compensation for real work in the securities industry, but this defendant’s alleged scheme was the white collar equivalent of a no-show job. He conspired to get paid for work he didn’t do, and paid kickbacks to those who enabled him. The FBI will continue to police fraud schemes that amount to theft, whether from building sites or brokerage firms.”

If convicted, the maximum term of imprisonment for securities fraud or conspiracy to commit securities fraud is 25 years. The maximum term of imprisonment for conviction of wire fraud or conspiracy to commit wire fraud is 20 years.

The government’s case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Winston M. Paes and Laura D. Mantell.

The Defendant:

RONALD GARCIA
Age: 62

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...