Skip to main content

JAIL TIME FOR NYC PSYCHIATRIST WHO DEFRAUDED MEDICAID

NEW YORK, N.Y. (December 22, 2009) - Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo today announced the felony guilty pleas of Dr. Godfrey Mbonu, a psychiatrist, and his corporate medical group Sisck Inc., to Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, a class “C” felony. Mbonu must pay more than $214,000 in restitution to the state and faces up to five to fifteen years in prison.

Mbonu’s plea comes after an extended investigation conducted by the Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU). The MFCU investigation revealed that from 2003 to 2009, Mbonu individually and through his corporation, Sisck Inc., located at 914-A Columbus Avenue in New York City, systematically submitted hundreds of claims to New York State’s Medicaid program for medical services that he or his medical group never provided.

“Records show this doctor fraudulently billed Medicaid hundreds of times for care that was never provided,” said Attorney General Cuomo. “He tried to game the system, was caught, and is now going to jail. My office will not tolerate people using the Medicaid system for personal gain.”

Records obtained by MFCU showed that Mbonu submitted claims to Medicaid that indicated that he performed psychotherapy sessions in his New York office when he was actually traveling in Nigeria. An extensive audit of patient records revealed that Mbonu also claimed to have performed in-office psychotherapy sessions when the patient listed in the claim was actually in the hospital. MFCU also discovered that to double his payment from Medicaid, Mbonu billed Medicaid at the higher psychiatrist rate when psychotherapy sessions were performed by a clinical social worker.

At his plea in New York County Supreme Court, Mbonu admitted to Acting Supreme Court Justice Carol Berkman that from 2003 to 2009 he intended to defraud Medicaid. As part of his plea, the Attorney General required that Mbonu pay $214,156.90 in restitution to the state. If Mbonu fails to pays the full restitution by the time of his sentence on April 28, 2010, the court can sentence him to a maximum of five to fifteen years in state prison. If Mbonu pays the restitution in full, he will be permitted to withdraw his plea to the C felony and plead guilty to Grand Larceny in the Third Degree, a class D felony, and receive a sentence of one year in jail.

Special Assistant Attorney General Vernitta N. Chambers handled the case under the supervision of Deputy Regional Director Thomas O’Hanlon, with the assistance of Special Investigator Thomas Dowd and Associate Special Auditor Investigators David Verhey and Andrea Ammirabile.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...