Skip to main content

Westgate Capital Fund Manager Pleads Guilty in Manhattan Federal Court to $133 Million Ponzi Scheme

PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that JAMES NICHOLSON—the President, Senior Portfolio Manager, and sole managing member of investment firm Westgate Capital Management LLC—pleaded guilty today in Manhattan federal court before United States District Judge RICHARD J. SULLIVAN to three felony charges, including securities fraud, investment adviser fraud, and mail fraud, involving losses of approximately $133 million.

According to the Complaint and Indictment previously filed in this case, as well as statements made during NICHOLSON's guilty plea proceeding:

Starting at least in 2004, NICHOLSON, among other things, represented to investors that Westgate Capital, a money management firm he founded in New York City, had assets under management ranging from $600 to $900 million. In truth and in fact, however, the true value of its assets was materially less. NICHOLSON also provided a private offering memorandum to investors in one of Westgate Capital's funds, Westgate Strategic Growth Fund, LP, that falsely stated that the Fund was audited by an independent accounting firm located in New York, New York. Marketing brochures for the Strategic Growth Fund also claimed positive returns for each month from January 2004 through August 2008, and a similar brochure for another Westgate fund showed uniformly positive returns for every month (except September 2001) from October 1999 through December 2007. In truth and in fact, however, performance of the funds was materially lower than represented. As a result of NICHOLSON's Ponzi scheme, investors suffered losses of approximately $133 million.

NICHOLSON pleaded guilty to the offenses set forth below, which contain the following maximum penalties:
COUNT OFFENSE COUNT OFFENSE MAXIMUM PENALTY
One Securities Fraud 20 years in prison; fine of greater
of $5 million or twice gross gain
or loss from offense
Two Investment Adviser
Fraud 5 years in prison; fine of $10,000
Three Mail Fraud 30 years in prison; fine of greater
of $1 million or twice gross gain
or loss from offense

In addition, NICHOLSON admitted to allegations in the Indictment seeking forfeiture of the proceeds of and property involved in the charged crimes.

NICHOLSON, 43, of Saddle River, New Jersey, is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge SULLIVAN on April 30, 2010.

"James Nicholson swindled his victims out of $133 million by making false assurances and claiming false profits," said United States Attorney PREET BHARARA. "Today's guilty plea is another important step in our ongoing effort to bring justice to victims of Ponzi schemes."

Mr. BHARARA praised the investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and thanked the United States Securities and Exchange Commission for its assistance in the investigation of this case.

Assistant United States Attorneys MARIA DOUVAS and JOSHUA KLEIN are in charge of the prosecution.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...