Skip to main content

ABDUL J. MAZUMDER, the owner of Subway franchises located throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn and the Bronx pleaded guilty today to felony charges of Grand Larceny

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the guilty plea of the owner of Subway franchises for stealing sales tax; evading personal income tax and fraudulently receiving Medicaid benefits. In addition to jail time, the defendant’s sentence will include nearly $1.5 million in restitution, interest and penalties.

“This case illustrates how City and State revenues are lost through this type of pervasive fraud,” said District Attorney Vance. “The honest taxpayers of New York were thrice victimized -- once by theft of sales tax paid by customers, then by shouldering the tax burden while the defendant evaded payment and finally by providing free health insurance to the defendant, who did not qualify.”

ABDUL J. MAZUMDER, 50, the owner of Subway franchises located throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn and the Bronx pleaded guilty today to felony charges of Grand Larceny, Offering a False Instrument for Filing in the First Degree, and Welfare Fraud and agreed to pay nearly $1.5 million back to the City and State. This includes more than $1.3 million in sales tax, accrued interest and penalties owed over a 6½ year period, $59,000 in personal income tax, accrued interest and penalties owed for tax years 2004 through 2008, and $65,000 in the cost of Medicaid benefits for New York City for public health insurance since 2004. The defendant is scheduled to return to court on June 30, 2010. The promised sentence will include weekend incarceration over a period of 50 weeks in jail and a fine of $15,000.

The defendant admitted in court that he failed to turn over to the State more than $500,000 in sales tax collected from Subway customers of 10 Subway locations. MAZUMDER failed to report approximately $61,000 in income on his 2007 New York personal income tax return and that he received Medicaid benefits for himself and his family by understating his income and assets.

District Attorney Vance thanked New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Acting Commissioner Jamie Woodward and Deputy Commissioner William Comiskey for the assistance of the Department. Auditors Ronald Chan and Chris-Ann Fenty and Hui-Qing (Ellen) Cheu of the Tax Department assisted in the case, with Investigator Thomas Toth of the New York City Human Resources Administration, under the supervision of Commissioner Robert Doar and Assistant Director Frank Pira.

The case was prosecuted by Assistant District Attorney Gilda Mariani, Chief of the Money Laundering and Tax Crimes Unit. Detective Anthony Pasquariello of the District Attorney’s Office Squad, Accountant Investigator Irene Serrapica of the Money Laundering and Tax Crimes Unit and Assistant District Attorney Marcy Chelmow the Public Assistance Fraud Unit Chief also assisted in the case.

Defendant Information:

ADBUL J. MAZUMDER, 1/31/60
37-06 69th Street
Woodside, NY 11377

Charges:

* Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, a class C felony
* Offering a False Instrument for Filing in the First Degree, a class E felony
* Welfare Fraud in the Second Degree, a class C felony

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...