Skip to main content

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCED THE PLEA IN 2007 MURDER OF BOITUMELO MCCALLUM

District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the guilty plea of MICHAEL CORDERO to Manslaughter in the First Degree. He will be sentenced to 25 years in prison on April 28, 2010.

MICHAEL CORDERO, 26, admitted in court today to strangling his girlfriend, Boitumelo McCallum, in her apartment at 4 Washington Square Village in Greenwich Village. CORDERO hit Ms. McCallum, who was 20 years old, strangled her, and then wrapped a towel around her head and face and knotted it, according to court documents. CORDERO then left Ms. McCallum’s body on the floor in her bedroom. CORDERO stole Ms. McCallum’s camera, laptop, cell phone, and knapsack.

“The death of this bright young woman was a tragedy,” said District Attorney Vance. “Although violent crime has thankfully declined overall, domestic violence has resisted that downward trend, often with fatal consequences. This senseless murder reminds us that we must do all we can to prevent violence in the home as vigorously as we fight crime in our streets. Our young adults need to understand the boundaries of appropriate relationships and know they should not have to tolerate physical or emotional abuse.”

Ms. McCallum’s body was discovered on August 5, 2007. CORDERO was arrested on August 8, 2007 and charged with the homicide.

Charge:

Manslaughter in the First Degree is a class B felony, punishable by up to 25 years in prison

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...