Skip to main content

James G. Litz, Pleads Guilty to Civil Rights Violation

The Department of Justice announced today that James G. Litz, 54, of the city of Tonawanda, N.Y., pleaded guilty before U.S. District Court Judge Richard J. Arcara, to a felony charge of deprivation of civil rights under the color of law. The offense carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, a fine of $250,000, or both.

Litz admitted in an executed plea agreement to assaulting and choking a victim on June 21, 2003, while the victim was in the rear of a city of Tonawanda Police vehicle. The plea agreement further detailed that the government had evidence of other incidents involving different victims occurring in 2009, consisting of the defendant poking one victim in the chest, twisting the defendant’s arm and causing pain, and grabbing and choking for a lengthy period of time another victim who happened to be at the scene of an arrest of a different individual. In both of the 2009 incidents, the plea agreement states that after assaulting the victims in the manner described, the defendant arrested the victims for "resisting arrest" and "disorderly conduct."

Sentencing is scheduled for Aug. 4, 2010, at 12:30 P.M. EDT in Buffalo, N.Y., in front of U.S. District Court Judge Richard J. Arcara.

"I have great respect for officers who enforce the law, but any officer who abuses his or her power and crosses the line as this defendant did must be held accountable," Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Thomas E. Perez said. "The Department of Justice is committed to aggressively prosecuting any officer who violates the law and the public trust."

U.S. Attorney William J. Hochul, Jr. of the Western District of New York stated that "the nation’s civil rights laws protect people of all race, color and creed. The laws apply to those in positions of power, such as police and jail officials. Those who violate their oaths to protect the public will be found and prosecuted as the facts and the law allow."

FBI Special Agent in Charge James H. Robertson stated, "it is imperative that the Western New York community has full confidence in it police professionals, and that the public understand there are no allegations of systemic corruption within the City of Tonawanda Police Department. The FBI’s Buffalo Office will continue to work closely with its Western New York law enforcement counterparts, including the United States Attorney's Office, to address public corruption at all levels."

The plea was the culmination of an investigation on the part of Special Agents of the FBI, under the direction of James H. Robertson. Assistant U.S. Attorney Trini E. Ross and Department of Justice Civil Rights Trial Attorney Shan Patel handled the case.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...