Skip to main content

NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION DEPUTY CHIEF FREDERICK GRIMALDI, PLEADS GUILTY TO FELONY BRIBERY CHARGES

NEW YORK, N.Y. (April 13, 2010) - Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo today announced the guilty pleas of New York City Department of Sanitation Deputy Chief Frederick Grimaldi on bribery charges related to a bid rigging scheme, and William “Billy” Cosidente, Jr. on extortion charges for his role as the “muscle” for a financially lucrative sports betting operation closely controlled by organized crime operating in Richmond County and elsewhere in New York City.

Grimaldi, 44, of Marlboro, New Jersey and Cosidente, 45, of Staten Island, New York, pleaded guilty today before Richmond County Supreme Court Justice Leonard Rienzi. They were indicted in November on charges resulting from a long-term joint investigation dubbed "Operation Pure Luck" by the Attorney General's Organized Crime Task Force and the New York City Police Department's Vice Enforcement Bureau.

“From top to bottom, we have successfully dismantled a criminal sports betting and loansharking operation headquartered in Richmond County while exposing a corrupt public employee who abused his position in government to line his pockets and steer taxpayer dollars to a family member,” said Attorney General Cuomo. “My office will continue to work closely with our colleagues at all levels of law enforcement in our ongoing efforts to combat organized crime in our neighborhoods and corruption in our government.”

New York City Department of Investigation Commissioner Rose Gill Hearn said, “This corrupt Sanitation manager betrayed the public and the City agency where he held a coveted, well-paid position. Fittingly, he stands convicted of a felony, his fate sealed by his own greed, incriminating words and conduct. DOI congratulates Attorney General Cuomo, Commissioner Kelly, District Attorney Donovan and all the law enforcement officers who brought this successful case, and we were pleased to assist in the investigation.”

Grimaldi pleaded guilty to Bribe Receiving in the Third Degree (class D felony) for receiving kickbacks on a Department of Sanitation contract for cement blocks intended for a structure to house road salt. The deal was orchestrated by reputed Gambino soldier Michael Murdocco, who is Grimaldi's father-in-law. Murdocco previously pleaded guilty to Enterprise Corruption (class B felony), Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree (Larceny by Extortion - class E felony), and Bribe Receiving in the Third Degree (class D felony). Murdocco will be sentenced on June 22. Grimaldi faces up to 2 1/3 to 7 years when sentenced on July 14.

William Cosidente pleaded guilty to Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree (Larceny by Extortion - class E felony). At the behest of Murdocco, Cosidente used intimidation to collect outstanding gambling debts. Cosidente faces up to 1 1/3 to 4 years when sentenced on May 27.

Reputed Gambino crime family Captain Carmine Sciandra previously pleaded guilty to several charges for his role in the criminal network including Enterprise Corruption (class B felony), and Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree (Larceny by Extortion - class E felony). As a condition of his plea, he will forfeit $1.2 million and faces 1 ½ - 4 ½ years in prison when he is sentenced on June 22nd. In addition to his supervision over loan sharking and illegal gambling businesses, Sciandra owns the Staten Island-based Top Tomato chain of specialty grocery stores.

The investigation utilized wiretaps coupled with traditional investigative techniques to gather evidence on the multi-county operations. According to court records, these members and associates of the Gambino Crime Family lent money to their victims at interest rates averaging 156% per year, and ran and protected an illegal sports gambling operation generating hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of wagers through an off-shore wireroom handling wagers on college and professional basketball, football, baseball and hockey games, as well as horse races. They collected from reluctant payers by using implicit threats of violence.

The case is being prosecuted by OCTF Assistant Deputy Attorney General Dana Roth under the supervision of Deputy Attorney General Peri Kadanoff. The Attorney General thanked the New York City Police Department’s Vice Enforcement Bureau, the New York City Department of Investigation and the office of Richmond County District Attorney Daniel Donovan for their assistance and cooperation, and the OCTF investigators for their continued work and participation in the underlying investigation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...