Skip to main content

Exporter Pleads Guilty to Conspiring to Defraud the U.S. Export-import Bank of More Than $24 Million

Guillermo O. Mondino, 47, of Miami, pleaded guilty today to leading a scheme to defraud the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) of more than $24 million, announced Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division Lanny A. Breuer, Osvaldo L. Gratacos, Acting Inspector General of the Ex-Im Bank, Special Agent in Charge (SAC) Rebecca A. Sparkman of the Internal Revenue Service Office of Criminal Investigation (IRS-CID) Washington, and Inspector in Charge Enrique Gutierrez of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service’s (USPIS) Miami Division.

Mondino entered his guilty plea in U.S. District Court in Washington before U.S. Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola. Mondino pleaded guilty to a two-count criminal information charging him with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States and to commit mail fraud, and one count of money laundering.

According to plea documents, Mondino was the owner of Texon Inc., an exporting company located in Miami. From April 2003 to May 2009, Mondino and others conspired to defraud the Ex-Im Bank by submitting false and fraudulent information to the Ex-Im Bank to obtain approximately $24 million in loans and to misappropriate certain loan proceeds. Mondino prepared or instructed others to prepare false documents that would be submitted to lending banks and the Ex-Im Bank to facilitate the fraudulent loan transactions. Mondino and his co-conspirators agreed that a smaller amount of the loan proceeds than was represented to the Ex-Im Bank would actually be used to purchase U.S. goods for foreign buyers, as specified by Ex-Im Bank loan program requirements. In some cases, Mondino provided loan proceeds to borrowers in cash rather than using the proceeds to purchase goods to be shipped to the borrowers. He also commingled the loan proceeds with personal and other monies and transferred loan proceeds to bank accounts controlled by co-conspirators. Texon and its related entities retained approximately $2.5 million of the loan proceeds, and Mondino retained approximately $170,000 of the loan proceeds for his own benefit and use.

Also according to plea documents, on Sept. 8, 2008, Mondino transmitted by wire approximately $217,647 of criminally derived money from a Texon bank account in Miami to the bank account of a freight forwarder in Laredo, Texas.

Mondino is set to be sentenced on Sept. 13, 2010, by U.S. District Court Judge Ricardo M. Urbina, and faces a maximum sentence of 15 years in prison and a $500,000 fine. According to the plea agreement, he has agreed to pay more than $2.7 million in forfeiture and to pay restitution in full as of the date of sentencing of more than $12.5 million.

Ex-Im Bank is an independent, self-sustaining U.S. Government agency that assists in financing the export of U.S. goods and services to markets around the world through export credit insurance, loan guarantees and direct loans.

The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Nicole H. Sprinzen of the Criminal Division's Fraud Section. The case is being investigated by the Ex-Im Bank, Office of Inspector General, the IRS-CID in Washington and the USPIS Miami Division.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...