Skip to main content

Five Current and Former New Orleans Police Officers Charged in the Shooting and Burning of a New Orleans Man in the Days After Hurricane Katrina

WASHINGTON—A federal grand jury has returned an 11-count federal indictment charging three current and two former New Orleans Police Department (NOPD) officers in connection with the police-involved shooting of Henry Glover, a New Orleans resident shot and killed in the days after Hurricane Katrina.

Today’s indictment was announced by Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division; Jim Letten, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Louisiana; and David Welker, Special Agent in Charge of the New Orleans Field Office of the FBI.

Former NOPD officer David Warren, former NOPD Lieutenant Robert Italiano, NOPD Lieutenants Dwayne Scheuermann and Travis McCabe, and Officer Gregory McRae are charged with crimes in connection with the Sept. 2, 2005, shooting and killing of Glover, the subsequent burning of his body in a car, the assault of civilians who tried to help Glover, and various offenses related to a cover-up of the incident.

Warren is in federal custody, having been arrested by special agents of the FBI immediately following the return of the indictment earlier today.

Specifically, Warren is charged with unnecessarily shooting and killing Glover and thereby violating his federally-protected right not to be subjected to the use of unreasonable force by a police officer. Warren, also charged with unlawfully using a firearm to commit this crime, faces a possible sentence of life in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Scheuermann and McRae are charged with obstructing justice and using fire in the commission of a federal offense, for burning Glover’s body and the 2001 Chevrolet Malibu in which his body was located. Scheuermann and McRae are also accused of assaulting civilians who came to Glover’s aid, thereby violating the rights of those civilians to be free from the use of unreasonable force. Scheuermann and McRae each face a possible maximum sentence of 60 years in prison, and fines of $1 million.

Italiano and McCabe are charged with obstruction of justice for their alleged roles in authoring and submitting a false and inaccurate incident report regarding the shooting and burning, and for other allegedly false statements they gave during the course of the federal investigation into this incident. Italiano faces a possible maximum sentence of 25 years in prison and a fine of $500,000. McCabe faces a possible maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a fine of $750,000.

“In the wake of a disaster like Hurricane Katrina, law enforcement have a responsibility to do everything in their power to protect public safety and to protect the residents of their city. Any officers who abuse their power and violate the law will be brought to justice,” said Assistant Attorney General Perez.

“Our deep gratitude goes to the team of federal investigators who continue to seek to defend the rights of victims of abuses following Hurricane Katrina,” said U.S. Attorney Letten. “We are absolutely committed to bring those who have violated the sacred rights of our citizens to justice, in the hope that our pursuit will give the people of New Orleans confidence in the protection of honest and professional law enforcement.”

“Behavior such as described in the indictment has no place in a free society, let alone law enforcement. Today’s indictment should clearly demonstrate the commitment of the FBI, the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division to aggressively and fairly investigate civil rights matters,” said Special Agent in Charge David Welker.

This case is being investigated by the New Orleans Field Office of the FBI. It is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Jared Fishman of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and Assistant U.S. Attorney Tracey Knight for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

An indictment is merely an accusation, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...