Skip to main content

FORMER NASSAU COUNTY LEGISLATOR ROGER CORBIN SENTENCED TO 18 MONTHS FOLLOWING CONVICTIONS FOR FILING FALSE TAX RETURNS, TAX EVASION, AND MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS

Earlier today, at the federal courthouse in Central Islip, New York, Roger Corbin, a former Nassau County Legislator who represented the Second Legislative District from 1995 until December 31, 2009, was sentenced to 18 months of incarceration by United States District Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein. Corbin pleaded guilty earlier this year to all seven counts of a superseding indictment, which charged him with tax evasion and filing false federal tax returns for the years 2005, 2006, and 2007, and making false statements to Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Internal Revenue Service. Judge Feuerstein also imposed 3 years of supervised release, a $700 special assessment and ordered Corbin to pay $92,170 in restitution.

Corbin’s sentence was announced by Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, George C. Venizelos, Acting Assistant Director-in-Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office, and Charles R. Pine, Special Agent-in-Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation, New York.

While serving as a Nassau County legislator, Corbin received more than 80 checks, totaling more than $229,000, from a developer who was doing business in Corbin’s district. Corbin deposited those checks, which were all made payable to “Cash,” into his personal bank accounts and used the money to support his lifestyle, but did not report any of the money as income on his original 2005, 2006, and 2007 federal income tax returns and did not pay any taxes on that income. Moreover, when he was interviewed by Special Agents of the FBI and IRS on November 20, 2008, Corbin falsely denied using any of the money from the developer for his personal benefit and claimed that he had given the money to an individual who was purportedly paying workers at the developer’s New Cassel construction sites. Subsequent investigation determined that the individual to whom Corbin claimed to have given the money died on November 9, 2005, and that Corbin received and deposited 73 of the checks, totaling approximately $206,500, after the death of that individual. In an April 2009 interview with federal prosecutors and agents, Corbin admitted that he used significant portions of the money derived from the developer’s checks for his own personal benefit and that he did not report that income on his federal tax returns in 2005, 2006, or 2007. Corbin further admitted that he made false statements to the agents during the November 20, 2008, interview.

The government’s case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys John J. Durham, Carrie N. Capwell, and Richard P. Donoghue.

The Defendant:



ROGER CORBIN
Age: 63

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...