Skip to main content

Jamali Brockett was sentenced to 287 months’ imprisonment on his convictions for sex trafficking

On June 24, 2010, at the federal courthouse in Brooklyn, Jamali Brockett was sentenced to 287 months’ imprisonment on his convictions for sex trafficking young girls and women and interstate transportation of women for the purposes of prostitution. He was also ordered to comply with sex offender registration. Brockett’s victims ranged in age from 14 to 19 years, and included four minors. The sentencing proceeding was held before United States Senior District Judge Sterling Johnson, Jr.

The sentence was announced by Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, George C. Venizelos, Acting Assistant Director-in-Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office, and Raymond W. Kelly, Commissioner, New York City Police Department.

On November 4, 2008, FBI agents arrested Brockett at a Long Island hotel where he was engaged in the act of prostituting two of his victims, one of whom was a 17-year-old girl. Brockett pleaded guilty to all charges in the indictment on October 16, 2009, and has remained in custody since his arrest.

As detailed in the sentencing letter filed by the government, Brockett used violence, coercion, and intimidation to force his victims to work as prostitutes. Two of the victims, ages 17 and 19, were physically grabbed off of the street by Brockett. To evade detection by law enforcement, Brockett moved his victims every few days between various hotels located in Brooklyn, Queens, and Long Island, and transported some to Washington D.C. and South Carolina for prostitution. Brockett posted sexually explicit ads for each victim under the “erotic services” section on Craigslist, and included his own phone number as the point of contact. Customers were directed to local hotels where Brockett forced his victims to perform sex acts for money and then pocketed all of the proceeds. If his victims attempted to escape, Brockett used violence against the victims and threatened their families. He also had sexual intercourse with his victims, including a 15-year-old girl.

Brockett came to the attention of law enforcement when a 14-year-old girl escaped from a hotel room in Manhattan and reported him to local law enforcement.

In announcing the sentence, Ms. Lynch expressed her grateful appreciation to the FBI and the New York City Police Department, the agencies responsible for conducting the government’s investigation.

The government’s case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Licha M. Nyiendo, Melissa Marrus, and Lan Nguyen.

The Defendant:
Name: JAMALI BROCKETT
Age: 26

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...