Skip to main content

Ernest G. Fink, Jr., Pleads Guilty to Largest Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Fraud in USDOT History

HARRISBURG, PA—Ernest G. Fink, Jr. 64, of Orwigsburg, Pa., pleaded guilty today before Senior U.S. District Court Judge Sylvia H. Rambo to conspiracy to defraud the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) and commit wire and mail fraud in connection with a $136 million disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) fraud scheme, which is the largest DBE fraud in USDOT history, announced the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. According to U.S. Attorney Peter J. Smith, Fink faces up to five years in prison; $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss in fines; and mandatory restitution as a result of his guilty plea. No date has been set for sentencing.

Fink was part-owner and chief operating officer of Schuylkill Products Inc. (SPI) and its wholly-owned subsidiary CDS Engineers Inc. until April 2009 when SPI was sold. SPI was based in Cressona, Pa., and manufactured concrete bridge beams used on highway construction projects in Pennsylvania and surrounding states. Fink admitted to participating in a 15-year conspiracy to defraud USDOT, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) and Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) in connection with the federal government’s DBE program.

USDOT provides billions of dollars a year to states and municipalities for the construction and maintenance of highways and mass transit systems on the condition that small businesses, owned and operated by disadvantaged individuals, receive a fair share of these federal funds. In Pennsylvania, PennDOT and SEPTA receive these funds and they require contractors to award a percentage of their subcontracts to eligible DBE’s.

Fink admitted today that between 1993 and 2008 he and other executives at SPI diverted over 300 PennDOT and SEPTA construction contracts to SPI and CDS that were worth $136 million and reserved for DBE’s. Fink and his co-conspirators executed the scheme by using a small Connecticut highway construction firm known as Marikina Construction Corporation as a front company to obtain these lucrative government contracts.

Marikina was owned by Romeo P. Cruz of West Haven, Conn., a naturalized American citizen born in the Philippines. Marikina was certified by PennDOT and SEPTA as a DBE. Fink admitted that although Marikina received the DBE contracts on paper, all the work was performed by SPI and CDS personnel, and SPI and CDS received the majority of the profits. In exchange for letting SPI and CDS use its name, Marikina was paid a small fixed fee, set by SPI.

The scheme was carried out for more than 15 years because of the numerous fraudulent steps the co-conspirators took to conceal the scheme. Fink admitted that SPI and CDS personnel routinely pretended to be Marikina employees by using Marikina business cards, e-mail addresses, stationery, and signature stamps, as well as using magnetic placards and decals bearing the Marikina logo to cover up SPI and CDS logos on SPI and CDS vehicles.

Previously, three former executives associated with SPI, CDS and Marikina entered guilty pleas for their roles in the scheme. Cruz pleaded guilty to conspiracy and tax fraud charges in 2008 and 2009. Timothy G. Hubler, of Ashland, Pa., CDS’ vice president in charge of field operations, pleaded guilty to conspiracy and tax fraud charges in 2008. Dennis F. Campbell, of Orwigsburg, Pa., SPI’s former vice president in charge of sales and marketing pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges in 2008. All three await sentencing.

SPI’s former co-owner, president, and CEO Joseph W. Nagle of Deerfield Beach, Fla., was indicted for his role in the scheme along with Fink on Nov. 19, 2009. The trial in that case is scheduled to begin Oct. 4, 2010 in federal court in Harrisburg, Pa.

The investigation was conducted by the FBI, USDOT Inspector General’s Office, the U.S. Department of Labor Inspector General’s Office, and the Criminal Investigation Division of the IRS. Senior Litigation Counsel Bruce Brandler is supervising the prosecution.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...