Skip to main content

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES SENTENCING IN CRANE CASE INVOLVING BRIBERY

State Prison for Crane Owner and Operator Who Sought Falsified Inspections and Licenses

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the sentencing of MICHAEL SACKARIS, 50, to two to six years in state prison for having offered numerous bribes to the Acting Chief Inspector for Cranes and Derricks for the New York City Department of Buildings (“DOB”). SACKARIS was the de facto owner of NU-WAY CRANE SERVICE (“NU-WAY”), a Suffolk County crane company, from 2002 to 2007. He offered the bribes in exchange for the falsification of both crane inspections and operator licenses.

“Fatal crane accidents have cut short too many lives in New York City,” said District Attorney Vance. “Bribing a city employee – particularly one charged with ensuring the public’s safety – is more than a criminal affront to the taxpayers who expect honest services from the city’s workforce. It put New Yorkers at an unnecessary and unacceptable risk. We are fortunate that no one was directly injured by the defendant’s actions.”

On approximately 20 occasions between December 2000 and January 2008, SACKARIS gave cash payments ranging from $200 to $500 to JAMES DELAYO, who was then the Acting Chief Inspector of Cranes and Derricks for DOB. The bribes were accepted as payment for the completion and filing of false DOB paperwork indicating that NU-WAY cranes had passed inspections. In fact, the cranes had not been inspected at all, or DELAYO had performed only perfunctory inspections. On six other occassions, DELAYO accepted cash payments from SACKARIS ranging from $200 to $500 to certify falsely that NU-WAY employees seeking crane operator licenses had passed their practical examinations. The bribes totaled more than $10,000 dollars.

DELAYO pled guilty to Bribe Receiving in the Second Degree on March 23, 2010, and was sentenced in June to two to six years in state prison. MICHAEL PASCALLI, an employee of NU-WAY, pled guilty on May 18, 2010 to Offering a False Instrument for Filing, a misdemeanor, relating to false documents that stated he had passed a New York State hoisting machine operating license examination. PASCALLI was sentenced to 3 years of probation.

DA Vance thanked Assistant District Attorneys Deborah Hickey, Carey Ng and Sean Sullivan, who are assigned to the District Attorney’s Office’s Rackets Bureau. They worked on this case under the supervision of Assistant District Attorney Eric Seidel, Chief of the Rackets Bureau.

District Attorney Vance also thanked New York City Department of Investigation Commissioner Rose Gill Hearn, Assistant Commissioner John Kantor, Inspector General Michael Carroll and Assistant Inspector General Edward Zinser.



Defendant Information:

MICHAEL SACKARIS, D.O.B. 3/8/1960
St. James, NY

Charge:

Bribery in the Second Degree, a class C felony, one count

Sentence:

2 to 6 years in state prison

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...