Skip to main content

Central Valley Auto Repair Company Sued By EEOC For Discrimination, Sexual Harassment And Retaliation

Oakdale Shop Manager Derided Women and Mexicans, Federal Agency Charges

SAN JOSE, Calif. — A San Joaquin/Stanislaus County, Calif., auto repair company violated federal law when it allowed its Oakdale shop manager to harass an employee due to her Mexican national origin and her gender and then fired her for reporting the discrimination, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed today.

According to the EEOC’s suit, Rena Flores, age 26 and of Mexican ancestry, worked as a secretary at Oakdale Collision Center . The EEOC’s investigation found that the store manager there publicly disparaged Mexicans, calling them “smelly,” “greasy” and “wetbacks.” He also regularly made sexist and sexually inappropriate comments, claiming that “women should clean the bathrooms, not men,” and that “women belonged barefoot and pregnant.” In addition, the manager asked Flores sexual questions and made sexually inappropriate comments, the EEOC said.

“His ‘jokes’ were painful and offensive,” said Flores. “He went off constantly, over a period of months. And when I finally gathered the courage to tell him and his bosses that this behavior was not OK, the company laid me off within a month and hired a new employee to do my job. It’s a relief to know that there is a law and a federal agency that say this is wrong and should be fixed.”

Harassment due to national origin and gender violates Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964. The law also protects workers who report discrimination from retaliation. After first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through conciliation, the EEOC filed the lawsuit (EEOC v. Robert Morgan Enterprises, Civil No. C 10-4757 PVT) in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and seeks monetary damages on behalf of Flores, training on anti-discrimination laws, posting of notices at the work site and other injunctive relief.

“Although the company had a written policy against harassment, clearly there was a failure to implement it,” said Michael Baldonado, the EEOC’s San Francisco District Director. “Our investigation revealed that some managers did not quite understand what conduct was prohibited by the policy, while others did not seem to be aware there was one to begin with .”

EEOC San Francisco Regional Attorney William R. Tamayo noted, “ All workers have a federally protected right to a workplace free from unlawful discrimination . In addition, workers have the right to report discrimination without fear of reprisal. The EEOC will vigorously defend both rights and hold employers accountable for harassment and retaliation.”

According to its website, www.morgancollision.com, Robert Morgan Enterprises is a Lathrop, Calif.-based business that owns and operates shops in Oakdale, Lathrop, Tracy, Stockton, Modesto and Manteca, Calif.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Additional information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...