Skip to main content

ATTORNEY GENERAL SCHNEIDERMAN ANNOUNCES $18 MILLION MEDICAID FRAUD SETTLEMENT WITH STATE’S LARGEST RESIDENTIAL SERVICE PROVIDER

Young Adult Institute Inflated Expenses to Justify Reimbursement of Excess Medicaid Dollars

NEW YORK, NY - Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman today announced a settlement with Young Adult Institute, Inc. (YAI), organization officials Philip H. Levy and Karen Wegmann, and former CEO Joel M. Levy, resolving allegations that they defrauded the Medicaid program. YAI, the state’s largest residential service provider, will pay $18 million in damages, and significantly reform their cost reporting practices.

“Restoring New Yorkers' faith in their government and cracking down on those who try to defraud the taxpayers will be two of our top priorities in this office," Attorney General Schneiderman said. "Today’s announcement should send a clear message that we will leave no stone unturned in the fight against Medicaid fraud, waste and abuse in New York State.”

Each year, YAI submits requests to the New York State Office for People with Developmental Disabilities, seeking funding for losses incurred to operate its programs. The amount of such rate appeals, or whether YAI is eligible to receive any adjustment at all, is based on an annually submitted Consolidated Fiscal Report – a lengthy report detailing all of the organization’s expenses. As a result, over the past 10 years, YAI received more than $8 million in additional funding from Medicaid.

However, beginning in at least 1999, YAI artificially inflated the expenses on its annual Consolidated Fiscal Reports to the state in order to receive additional funding that it was not entitled to receive. Specifically, YAI allocated the expenses related to certain employees to programs and sites at which those employees never worked. The company also listed high level administrative staff as clinic social workers, and improperly categorized fundraising expenses – all to inflate YAI’s expenses and extract more money from the Medicaid program.

The investigation began after a whistleblower filed a complaint that YAI had improperly inflated its expense reports. Of the $18 million YAI will pay in damages, $10.8 million will be returned to the New York State Medicaid program. The investigation was conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.

The case was handled by Special Assistant Attorney General Jacob Bergman for the New York State Medicaid Fraud Control Unit.

New Yorkers are urged to report cases of suspected fraud to the Attorney General’s toll-free Medicaid Fraud Hotline, at 1-866-NYS-FIGHT (697-3444).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...