Skip to main content

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT IN $4 MILLION PONZI SCHEME

BRIAN KIM and LIQUID CAPITAL Accused of Stealing From At Least 45 Victims

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. today announced the indictment of BRIAN KIM, 35, for running a Ponzi scheme that resulted in the theft of more than $4 million from at least 45 victims. Both KIM and his hedge fund, LIQUID CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC (“LIQUID CAPITAL”), were indicted on charges of Grand Larceny in the First and Second Degree, Scheme to Defraud, Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree and felony violations of the Martin Act (New York State’s securities fraud statute).[1]

“The defendant induced his clients to make risky and speculative investments by portraying himself as an accomplished trader and money manager,” said District Attorney Vance. “This is just the latest example of our need for stronger legislation to prosecute these types of financial crimes, including a strengthened Martin Act, which will help deter fraudulent conduct and protect investor trust.”

According to documents filed in court, KIM first began operating this scheme while based in Manhattan beginning in approximately January 2003. By portraying himself as an accomplished trader and money manager, KIM induced members of the technology industry, and other professionals, to invest in what the defendant promised were safe, stable, and consistently profitable securities. Instead, KIM diverted vast amounts of money to himself while also generating enormous financial losses in trades of highly speculative futures contracts. To conceal his scheme, KIM created fake monthly performance statements for individual investors showing fictitious account balances with inflated gains that concealed actual trading losses.

KIM is currently a fugitive. In late 2009, KIM was indicted a Manhattan Grand Jury in a separate case on charges of Grand Larceny and Forgery. In that case, KIM is accused of stealing $430,000 in June 2008 from the Christadora House, a condominium complex where KIM resided. KIM failed to appear in New York State Supreme Court for trial on January 4, 2011, and a bench warrant was issued for his arrest.

The United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), has today also filed an enforcement action against KIM and LIQUID CAPITAL.

This investigation was conducted by Assistant District Attorneys Harold J. Wilson and Edward M. Burns of the Major Economic Crimes Bureau, who handled the case under the supervision of Deputy Bureau Chief Adam Miller, Bureau Chief Richard Weber, and Executive Assistant District Attorney Adam S. Kaufmann, Chief of the Investigation Division. Trial Preparation Assistants James MacFadyen, Jennie Sirignano and Peter Shakro assisted in this investigation, along with Supervising Investigator Santiago Batista.

District Attorney Vance thanked the CFTC, specifically Manal Sultan, Chief Trial Attorney, Nathan B. Ploener, Senior Trial Attorney, Lara Turcik, Trial Attorney, and Investigators Judith Slowly and Christopher Giglio.

CFTC Regional Counsel Stephen J. Obie and Deputy Regional Counsel Lenel Hickson, Jr., also provided assistance.



Defendant Information:

BRIAN KIM, D.O.B. 3/25/1975
Address Unknown

Charges:

Grand Larceny in the First Degree, Class B felony, 1 count
Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, Class C felony, 1 count
Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, Class E felony 1 count
Violation of the General Business Law (Martin Act), Class E felony 2 counts
Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, Class E felony 21 counts

A class B felony is punishable by up 25 years in prison, a class C felony is punishable by up to 15 years in prison, a class E felony is punishable by up to 4 years in prison.



[1] The charges in this indictment are merely allegations and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...