Skip to main content

Members of Staten Island narcotics distribution network arrested on federal drug and firearm charges

NEW YORK - Five individuals who are believed to have run a crack and powder cocaine distribution network based on Staten Island, New York, have been arrested, following an investigation by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)and the New York City Police Department (NYPD).

A five-count superseding indictment in the case was unsealed Wednesday in the Eastern District of New York and is the result of an ongoing investigation into criminal activity on the north shore of Staten Island. The five defendants are Andre Collier, 30; Benito Il Defonso, 34; Steven Il Defonso, 32; Alexandra Klein, 32; and Dion Nelson, 31; will appear in federal court at noon Friday, February 11, 2011, before U.S. District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis in Brooklyn, New York.

Each defendant has been charged with, among other offenses, conspiring to distribute crack and powder cocaine, and using and carrying firearms while carrying out their drug trafficking conspiracy. As detailed in the superseding indictment and other filings with the court, the defendants sold both wholesale and retail quantities of crack and powder cocaine in Staten Island over the past ten years and used violence, and the threat of violence, to protect their trafficking operations.

Court documents detail how in 2002, Benito Il Defonso, a leader of the group, allegedly conspired to murder a witness in a trial of codefendant Andre Collier who was being tried for an earlier shooting. In 2008 and 2009, the defendants used members of the Bloods street gang to protect multiple narcotics stash houses they operated in a Staten Island apartment.

On September 18, 2009, law enforcement authorities served a search warrant at a stash house operated by the defendant Dion Nelson. At that time, four loaded firearms, two bullet-proof vests, numerous rounds of ammunition, and quantities of narcotics and drug paraphernalia were seized.

"This investigation targeted allegedly violent individuals engaged in destructive patterns of behavior, including drug trafficking and violence," said HSI special agent-in-charge James T. Hayes, Jr. "We are pleased to be working closely with our law enforcement partners and remain dedicated to bringing this type of criminal activity to a halt in our communities."

"As alleged in the indictment and related court filings, these defendants are members of a long-standing, armed drug ring that has wreaked havoc in Staten Island for years," stated U.S. Attorney Loretta E. Lynch. "We are grateful for the continuing cooperation of the Office of the District Attorney for Richmond County in connection with this investigation and prosecution."

"Time and time again law enforcement has seen violence associated with drug trafficking. As alleged, this investigation identified a drug organization that used guns and intimidation in order to further their illegal drug sales for one reason only, to make a profit," said DEA special agent-in-charge John P. Gilbride. "These arrests exemplify that law enforcement will not tolerate drug trafficking and the associated violence. We are determined to provide safe communities for the residents of New York City."

"The five individuals arrested and charged today allegedly sold crack and cocaine and used violence to further their drug trade. As reflected in documents filed with the court, one defendant even conspired to murder a witness he believed intended to testify about an earlier shooting," said NYPD Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly. "I commend the NYPD detectives, DEA and HIS agents, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for their work in bringing the defendants to justice."

To date, this investigation has resulted in the filing of federal narcotics and firearms charges against more than 25 individuals. If convicted, the defendants face maximum sentences of life imprisonment.

The government's case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Shreve Ariail, Daniel Silver, and Zainab Ahmad. The charges contained in the superseding indictment are merely allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...