Skip to main content

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES CONVICTION IN $7 MILLION INSURANCE FRAUD TRIAL

Defendants Staged Burglary of Diamond District Jewelry Office to Collect Insurance Payment

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the convictions of two jewelry wholesalers for staging a gunpoint robbery of their office in order to collect an insurance payment of $7 million. Following a bench trial before Justice Thomas Farber, ATUL SHAH, 49, and MAHAVEER KANKARIYA, 44, were found guilty of Insurance Fraud in the First Degree, Attempted Grand Larceny in the First Degree, and Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree.

"In a desperate gamble, the defendants devised an elaborate scheme involving disguises, a staged burglary and insurance fraud to escape their financial troubles," District Attorney Vance said. "Thanks to the quick work of our Office and the NYPD, it is clear that crime does not pay."

As proven at trial, on December 31, 2008, the defendants falsely alleged that two individuals dressed as Orthodox Jewish men entered the jewelry wholesale offices located at 2 West 46th Street and stole at gunpoint approximately $9 million worth of jewelry and diamonds. SHAH and KANKARIYA subsequently made a demand for payment from their insurance company on a policy in the amount of $7 million.

However, an investigation uncovered evidence that the defendants staged the robbery in order to commit insurance fraud. A video recording retrieved from a damaged Digital Video Recorder that was recovered from the scene revealed that SHAH and KANKARIYA had removed a significant amount of jewelry from the safe approximately two hours before the alleged robbery and replaced the jewels with empty trays.

Assistant District Attorneys Kavita Bovell and Eugene Hurley prosecuted the case under the supervision of Trial Bureau 50 Chief Warren Murray. District Attorney Vance thanked NYPD Detective Kevin Buehler for assisting in the investigation.

The defendants are scheduled to be sentenced April 29, 2011.

Defendant Information:
ATUL SHAH, D.O.B. 10/25/1961
Closter, New Jersey

Convicted:

Insurance Fraud in the First Degree, a class B felony, 2 counts
Attempted Grand Larceny in the First Degree, a class C felony, 2 counts
Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, a class E felony, 3 counts

Defendant Information:
MAHAVEER KANKARIYA, D.O.B. 4/17/1966
Norwood, New Jersey

Convicted:

Insurance Fraud in the First Degree, a class B felony, 2 counts
Attempted Grand Larceny in the First Degree, a class C felony, 2 counts
Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, a class E felony, 3 counts

A class B felony is punishable by up 25 years in prison, a class C felony is punishable by up to 15 years in prison, and a class E felony is punishable by up to 4 years in prison.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...