Skip to main content

"PLASTIC SURGEON" HECTOR CABRAL INDICTED FOR PRACTICING MEDICINE WITHOUT A LICENSE

NEW YORK- Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman today announced the indictment of Dominican-based "plastic surgeon" Hector Cabral, an unlicensed doctor in the state of New York, who allegedly performed cosmetic procedures on women and left many of them permanently disfigured. Arraigned in New York State Supreme Court before the Honorable Justice Laura Ward, Cabral was charged with 10 counts of Unauthorized Practice of a Profession (Medicine) and 2 additional counts with a Co-Defendant Alma Melo for Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree and Conspiracy in the Fifth Degree.

"Practicing medicine without a license is a very serious crime in New York, and we will a seek a punishment against anyone who preys on vulnerable communities to make a quick buck. Mr. Cabral lured unsuspecting patients with bargain prices for very complex medical procedures, putting his own greed before the health and safety of his victims," said Attorney General Schneiderman.

It is alleged that on at least 10 different occasions between November 2006 and approximately November 2009, Hector Cabral unlawfully practiced medicine without a license, charging a fee for medical consultations and examinations to women at various health spas and beauty parlors in New York State. It is further alleged that Hector Cabral would then perform cosmetic surgical procedures on these women in the Dominican Republic. Immediately after performing surgery he would advise these women to contact the Co-Defendant, for "Post Operative Treatment" in New York State. It is also alleged that from on or about August 2008 to on or about October 2009, Cabral and the Co-Defendant engaged in a scheme to defraud 10 or more persons.

If convicted Cabral could be incarcerated for a period of more than 20 years.

Mr. Cabral is currently free on bail, but Judge Ward denied an application made by his lawyer for the return of his passport. A warrant has been issued for the Arrest of the Co-Defendant.

This case was adjourned to May 23, 2011 before Justice Ward for motion practice.

The charges against Cabral and the Co-defendant are allegations. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

The case is being handled by Guy H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General in Charge of the Harlem Regional Office, with the assistance of Assistant Attorney General Judy Prosper of the Harlem Regional Office, under the supervision of Gail Heatherly, Chief of the Criminal Prosecution Bureau. Investigators Angel LaPorte, Ismael Hernandez and David Negron under Supervising Investigator John McManus are assisting with the investigation of the case.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...